'Avengers: Age of Ultron' is semi-enjoyable but not as good as the first

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The plot in 'Ultron' is essentially one catastrophe after another and the Avengers’ attempts at wisecracks aren’t all that smart.

|
Jay Maidment/Disney/Marvel/AP
'Avengers: Age of Ultron' stars Chris Evans (l.) and Chris Hemsworth (r.).

“The Avengers” was the third-highest-grossing film of all time, and I don’t doubt that “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” which is semi-enjoyable but not as good, will also ascend the higher reaches of moola. Such is the megapopularity of this Marvel superhero franchise that the filmmakers could have featured the clan playing dodgeball and achieved a similar success.

There’s quite a bit more than dodgeball going on in “Ultron," to the point of literal overkill. All the stalwarts, looking as fit as usual, are back: Clint Barton/Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey, Jr.), Steve Rogers/Captain America (Chris Evans), Bruce Banner/The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), Natasha/Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), and Thor (Chris Hemsworth). Their nemesis is Ultron (voiced with snide amusement by James Spader), a state-of-the-art humanoid who, of course, wants to take over the world and unload a new race of mass-produced android soldiers. 

Writer-director Joss Whedon attempts to inject just enough human drama into these noisy proceedings to keep it from turning into a “Transformers”-style crashathon. (Best subplot: Black Widow and The Hulk get closer, but no smooches.) The action sequences aren’t especially well designed, and the plot, such as it is, is essentially one catastrophe after another. The Avengers’ attempts at smarty-pants wisecracks aren’t all that smart. And yet none of this probably matters to the film’s geekish fan base, who are already slavering for sequels. Grade: B- (Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action, violence and destruction, and for some suggestive comments.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Avengers: Age of Ultron' is semi-enjoyable but not as good as the first
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2015/0430/Avengers-Age-of-Ultron-is-semi-enjoyable-but-not-as-good-as-the-first
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe