- Amnesty International report brands Libya's militias 'out of control'
- Obama proposes bringing jobs home from overseas. Would his plan work?
- Obama's NASA budget: Mars takes a hit, but space science isn't dead
- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down? (+video)
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
- Angry Birds joins Facebook in bid to reach 800 million users
Brothers: movie review
Tobey Maguire plays a returning vet in ‘Brothers,’ a dark drama about identity and the costs of war on the home front.
In this film publicity image released by Lionsgate, Tobey Maguire, left, and Jake Gyllenhaal are shown in a scene from, 'Brothers.'
Lorey Sebastian/Lionsgate/AP
“Brothers,” the latest in a lineup of home-from-the-war movies that extends back to “Stop-Loss” and “In the Valley of Elah,” is frustrating because it misuses so much talent. Tobey Maguire, deeply miscast, plays Sam, the dutiful Marine son of an alcoholic father (Sam Shepard) who is presumed dead in Afghanistan. Natalie Portman is Sam’s high school sweetheart wife, and Jake Gyllenhaal, in the film’s only piece of believable acting, is Sam’s ne’er-do-well brother who is helping raise his two kids. Then Sam unexpectedly returns, and his violent degeneration consists mostly of breaking things and shouting. Jim Sheridan, who in better times is capable of being as good as it gets with actors – in “My Left Foot” and “In the Name of the Father” – directed from a script by David Benioff. Grade: C (Rated R for language and some disturbing violent content.)
Skip to next paragraph








Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube