Lady Gaga's national anthem: Her vocal prowess wows

Lady Gaga's rendition of the national anthem at Super Bowl 50 was just the most recent performance in which she's gotten the attention of critics with her powerful vocals.

|
Gregory Payan/AP
Lady Gaga warms up before performing at the NFL Super Bowl 50 football game.

Singer Lady Gaga followed in the footsteps of such singers as Idina Menzel, Renee Fleming, and Whitney Houston by performing the national anthem at the Super Bowl, with Gaga taking on the job this year.

Gaga earned rave reviews for her rendition of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” 

“Lady Gaga’s national anthem performance is total perfection,” USA Today writer Patrick Ryan wrote of the song. “Gaga took her time and hit every note.” 

Rolling Stone called the song “stirring… powerful.” 

To Gaga fans, her vocal chops are no surprise. The Super Bowl performance follows a 2014 album ("Cheek to Cheek") of covers of jazz standards with singer Tony Bennett and having performed a musical tribute to the 1965 film “The Sound of Music” at the 2015 Oscars, a rendition for which she also earned praise for her technical skill. 

Gaga got notice early on in her career for her over-the-top outfits and stage shows, but she has worked extensively on her singing, with, for example, Oscars producer Craig Zadan telling Entertainment Tonight that Gaga had studied daily with a vocal coach for six months prior to her “Music” performance. 

She was accepted to the Juilliard School when she was young but instead chose to attend a different school. She also studied piano. “I was classically trained as a pianist and that innately teaches you how to write a pop song, because when you learn Bach inversions, it has the same sort of modulations between the chords,” Gaga told the Telegraph in an interview. 

Performing with Bennett brought praise from some critics for her singing. “A bright, aggressive ‘La Vie en Rose,’ sung mostly in French, demonstrated her formidable vocal skills,” New York Times writer Stephen Holden wrote in a review of a concert with Gaga and Bennett last summer.

Her performance at the Oscars, a huge platform that regularly attracts more than 30 million viewers, drew even more attention. Gaga performed in a white evening gown with simple hair and makeup in contrast to her past headline-grabbing outfits, she's emerged as an artist having the vocals to take center stag. 

“Eye-popping theatrics are usually par for the course when it comes to Gaga,” Billboard writer Jason Lipshutz wrote in discussing both the Oscars performance and her taking the stage at the Grammys. “But at the Grammys and Oscars, there was no blood-spurting, no male alter egos, no in-song costume changes nor giant eggs to burst out of onstage. At the Grammys and Oscars, Gaga sang decades-old classics, without dancing, or wearing an elaborate outfit. And in both instances, she absolutely dazzled.”

Meanwhile, Time writer Daniel D’Addario wrote of the Oscars that the singer “went old-school, and it worked… [she] ditched her usual elaborate theatrics for a pared-down, beautiful 50th-anniversary tribute to ‘The Sound of Music’… [she] has reinvented herself in the most surprising way of all: by leaning heavily on songcraft and artistry.” 

Gaga’s performance at the Super Bowl was just the latest example of the singer getting attention for her vocal power rather than an unusual outfit or stagecraft choice.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Lady Gaga's national anthem: Her vocal prowess wows
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0209/Lady-Gaga-s-national-anthem-Her-vocal-prowess-wows
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe