Impressionists on the road
Fine art collection of two prescient Welsh sisters set to dazzle small cities in US.
(Page 2 of 2)
"The Turners grab you by the throat with their turbulence and atmospheric effects," says Brosius, "then the story starts to unfold." The show marches through romantic realism by Corot and Millet, Daumier's scenes of urban life (a new subject for art of that day), full-blown Impressionism by the likes of Monet, Manet, and Renoir, up to Post-Impressionism of Cézanne, Bonnard, and Van Gogh.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Seventy-five percent of the works are French, with the British artist Turner as a precursor to Impressionism.
Among the standouts is Turner's "The Storm," a dramatic scene of a shipwreck, in which a foundering boat almost dissolves in the foam of tempestuous waves. For Turner, the subject is never the point. His swirling veils of luminous color are paramount, a direct influence on Monet.
Painters of their 'present'
The exhibition next presents Corot's misty landscapes with their silvery, olive tones, then paintings by his Barbizon School colleague Millet, known for his scenes of peasant life. A hyperdramatic scene by Millet, "The Gust of Wind," portrays the moment a tree is ripped up by its roots, hovering menacingly over a cowering shepherd – an apocalyptic view of nature. Daumier, who was little known in Britain, is represented not by his biting caricatures, but his oil paintings of contemporary street life. While other British collectors were buying escapist, fantasy fare like the Pre-Raphaelites' views of Camelot, the Davies sisters were looking squarely at the present.
The Impressionists' landscapes, which make up the chief glory of the collection, were also not idyllic views of the past or of disappearing rural life but instead showed an unabashed acceptance of the modern, everyday world.
Nature scenes by Monet, Manet, Renoir, Pissarro, and Sisley typically acknowledge industry by including smokestacks, trains, or bridges. Not only their subjects but also their techniques reflected change. Their radical new approach to color and form, rendered through flickering brush strokes to convey a spontaneous, in-the-moment snapshot, was revolutionary.
In Monet's "Palazzo Dario," half the canvas is blue water, chopped up with strokes of pink, white, and green paint, to evoke the watery world of Venice and its shifting light. In "Charing Cross Bridge," the murky atmosphere is the subject. In this "pea souper," never has fog looked so luscious, with the bridge and distant Houses of Parliament mere ghostly hints.
Renoir's "La Parisienne," a life-size portrait of a young coquette in a fetching, cobalt-blue day dress, unequivocally shows a modern woman whose direct gaze boldly confronts the viewer. The absence of background detail and sketchy rendering of the figure were considered audacious.
The sisters went way out on a limb when purchasing paintings by Cézanne, who'd been virtually ignored by British collectors. His more abstract, geometric approach with his color patches of blue, green, and terra cotta uniting the composition, held no fear for them.
Van Gogh as showstopper
But it's Vincent van Gogh's "Rain-Auvers," finished in 1890 a few weeks before his death, that's the showstopper.
In a letter to his brother the artist describes "vast fields of wheat beneath troubled skies" that express "sadness, extreme solitude."
With slashing strokes that look like falling stars, he cuts through the thick impasto of the bands of color representing fields and sky. The painting captures the plunging mood of today's troubled times but offers a grain of reassurance. Rain nurtures growth, just as art considered shockingly radical provides seeds for the future.