Does Tesla's Autopilot feature mislead drivers?

Consumer safety watchdogs question the ethics of releasing an auto safety feature that is still in beta testing, and wonder if the branding of 'Autopilot' has erroneously led drivers to place too much trust in the technology.

|
Alexandria Sage/Reuters
The interior of a Tesla Model S is shown in autopilot mode in San Francisco, April 7. Consumer safety watchdogs are calling for Tesla to pull back on its Autopilot feature in light of crash concerns.

Tesla has been asked to brief the US Senate committee over auto safety issues about the May crash that killed the vehicle’s occupant while the car was on Autopilot mode.

Consumer safety watchdogs now say that Tesla may be moving too fast with the introduction of its Autopilot software.

Since the crash, Consumer Reports magazine has urged Tesla to disable the automatic steering mechanism, saying that marketing the mechanism as “Autopilot” may lead drivers to believe that they do not have to retain control of the car, despite Tesla’s assertions to the contrary.

"We're deeply concerned that consumers are being sold a pile of promises about unproven technology,” Laura MacCleery, vice president of consumer policy and mobilization for Consumer Reports said in the statement. "'Autopilot' can't actually drive the car, yet it allows consumers to have their hands off the steering wheel for minutes at a time."

The crash that led the US Senate to summon Tesla for testimony occurred on May 7. Driver Joshua Brown was killed when Autopilot failed to recognize a turning tractor trailer in its path.

Some analysts suggest that calls to disarm the Autopilot systems are premature, pending conclusive investigation into the crash.

"Despite an avalanche of hit-pieces and misguided op-eds," writes tech journalist Yoni Heisler for BGR, a consumer electronics publication, "it’s far too soon to say with any certainty that Tesla’s Autopilot software has been the direct cause of any specific crash."

In a blog post about the accident, Tesla wrote, “Neither Autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied,” leading to Mr. Brown’s death.

Autopilot uses several tools, including cameras and radar, to survey the vehicle’s surroundings and perform functions such as braking at stoplights and changing lanes on the highway. Yet, despite its name, Tesla says that the mechanism is intended to reduce the burden of driving on the vehicle’s operator, not remove it completely.

Several consumer watchdogs, however, say that the name creates a false sense of security, and that Tesla should scale back its Autopilot program before more people get hurt. Consumer Reports asked Tesla to change the name of the program, which Tesla says is still in public beta testing.

Two other recent crashes have increased public scrutiny of Autopilot. Most recently, a Pennsylvania crash involving an Autopilot enabled vehicle prompted a US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigation.

Tesla's chief executive officer, Elon Musk, wrote in a tweet that while the driver in the Pennsylvania crash claimed Autopilot was turned on, investigation showed that it was not. And if it had been turned on, Mr. Musk says, the car would not have crashed.

A Montana crash on Sunday, however, occurred while the Autopilot feature was turned on. The driver’s hands were not on the wheel.

This week, NHTSA announced that it wanted records of how often Autopilot drivers were told to keep their hands on the wheel.

Consumer Reports also says that Tesla should never have allowed consumers to purchase vehicles with a feature that, as the company itself says, is not yet out of beta testing.

“Consumers should never be guinea pigs for vehicle safety 'beta' programs,” said Ms. MacCleery. “At the same time, regulators urgently need to step up their oversight of cars with these active safety features. NHTSA should insist on expert, independent third-party testing and certification for these features, and issue mandatory safety standards to ensure that they operate safely."

Tesla announced that while the company appreciates recommendations by critics such as Consumer Reports and Computerworld, it will make decisions about the future of its products, including Autopilot, based on “real-world data.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Does Tesla's Autopilot feature mislead drivers?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0715/Does-Tesla-s-Autopilot-feature-mislead-drivers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe