Underwater tech: Why does Microsoft want to dunk its data centers?

When it comes to cooling hot computer servers, Microsoft says it's found an underwater remedy to lower costs and increase efficiency. 

|
Microsoft/Project Natick
The Natick Team: Eric Peterson, Spencer Fowers, Norm Whitaker, Ben Cutler, Jeff Kramer (left to right).

In the quest for affordable data centers, Microsoft has gone where no technology company has gone before: underwater. 

Data centers, which host everything from e-mail accounts to social media profiles, require lots of energy. Just as laptops and cellphones heat up when they are working really hard, data centers have thousands of computer servers that get very hot. To avoid overheating and crashing, companies are forced to foot expensive air conditioning bills. 

Some companies such as Facebook have moved their data centers to Arctic locations to lower cooling costs.  

But Microsoft tried a new way to cool data centers by placing an eight-foot server vessel 30 feet underwater. The experimental trial period of Leona Philpot, Microsoft's eight-foot prototype named after a character in the Xbox game "Halo," lasted between August and November of last year 1 kilometer off the California coast. 

The conclusion? Leona Philpot was more successful than expected. And more important, say Microsoft engineers, underwater data centers hold exciting potential.

“When I first heard about this I thought, ‘Water … electricity, why would you do that?” Ben Cutler, a Microsoft computer designer who worked on the Project Natick system, told The New York Times. “But as you think more about it, it actually makes a lot of sense.” 

Primarily, Project Natick could reduce latency, engineers’ term for the amount of time it takes servers to respond to users' online requests. Today’s data centers are built in remote places that offer the necessary room or colder climates – making data travel a long distance between its source and destination. 

“Half of the world’s population lives within 200 km of the ocean so placing datacenters offshore increases the proximity of the datacenter to the population” says the Project Natick website, “dramatically reducing latency and providing better responsiveness.” 

Microsoft also believes it can speed up the production process so a ready-to-use vessel is set up in just 90 days, which could come in handy for areas needing periodic data boosts, such as World Cup events or natural disaster sites.  

And Microsoft suggests the future of underwater data centers holds environmental promise, not damage. 

Natick engineers say the vessel consumes no water, does not heat up the water, and does not cause noise pollution for nearby sea life.

Using acoustic sensors, the engineers determined that the movements of nearby shrimp drowned out any underwater noise from Natick, and they “measured no heating of the marine environment beyond a few inches from the vessel,” Dr. Lee told The New York Times. 

And in the future, engineers believe subsea data centers could be zero-emission by using underwater tidal power to generate the necessary electricity. 

“Natick datacenters are envisioned to be fully recycled. Made from recycled material which in turn is recycled at the end of life of the datacenter,” the Microsoft team explains on Natick’s website. “A Natick datacenter co-located with offshore renewable energy sources could be truly zero emission: no waste products, whether due to the power generation, computers, or human maintainers are emitted into the environment.” 

Instead, the greatest challenge involves the vessels’ relationship with humans, not the environment. 

Data centers on land are easily accessible to engineers and witness frequent tweaks and fixes. But underwater systems, comparatively, need to survive years without maintenance or regular checkups. And Microsoft sees this challenge as a positive, not a negative. 

“We see this as an opportunity to field long-lived, resilient datacenters that operate ‘lights out’ – nobody on site – with very high reliability for the entire life of the deployment, possibly as long as 10 years,” Natick’s website explains. 

But the long-term feasibility and environmental impact remain to be seen with further trials. Microsoft is already working on its next underwater project, a data center three times the size of Leona Philpot

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Underwater tech: Why does Microsoft want to dunk its data centers?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0201/Underwater-tech-Why-does-Microsoft-want-to-dunk-its-data-centers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe