Streaming music service Grooveshark goes dark

The Grooveshark website paid no royalties to artists or record companies and has been in legal trouble since 2009.

|
Grooveshark
Steaming music service Grooveshark shut down on Thursday to settle a longstanding series of lawsuits against it. Here, the Grooveshark homepage in 2014 shows an ad for the service's "VIP" streaming tier.

Grooveshark has been around longer than Spotify, Rdio, Beats Music, or Google Play. At its peak, it had more than 35 million users and a virtually infinite library of music. Yet Grooveshark, which allowed users to upload music to the site for others to stream, didn't seek licenses from the recordings' copyright holders. Instead, they argued that they should not be held liable if site users upload copyrighted works, which they did in great quantities.

This approach didn’t sit well with the three major American record companies, which began litigating against Grooveshark in 2009. On Thursday, Grooveshark agreed to shut down its web and mobile sites and to hand over all its patents and copyrights in order to settle the lawsuits against it. A note posted on Grooveshark’s home page read in part, “We failed to secure licenses from rights holders for the vast amount of music on the service. That was wrong. We apologize. Without reservation.”

Last year, a federal judge found that Grooveshark was at fault by allowing music to be streamed on its service without compensating artists or record labels. In addition, the judge found that Grooveshark employees had uploaded thousands of copyrighted songs to the service, so the company couldn’t claim protection against the actions of its users. Earlier this month, the judge ruled that Escape Media Group, the company that owned Grooveshark, could be liable for more than $700 million in statutory copyright damages because the copyright infringement was willful.

Instead, Grooveshark’s founders, Sam Tarantino and Josh Greenberg, worked out a settlement in which they shut down the Grooveshark service entirely, deleted all copyrighted songs, and handed over all their intellectual property to the record companies. Mr. Tarantino and Mr. Greenberg acknowledged that their service had infringed copyright, and Escape Media Group agreed to “significant financial penalties” if the settlement terms were not followed, according to The New York Times.

The settlement also means that Broadcasts, Grooveshark’s attempt at a legal streaming service, is no more. Broadcasts was an app for iOS and Android that gave users access to curated playlists for 99 cents per month. Broadcasts used standard royalty rates to reimburse artists and record labels for songs streamed, so Grooveshark didn’t need to negotiate directly with Universal, Sony, and Warner to secure rights.

At the time Grooveshark was founded, no similar streaming service existed. Spotify didn’t come to the US until 2011, and other services such as Pandora selected songs for users, rather than allowing them to choose what to listen to from an online library.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Streaming music service Grooveshark goes dark
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0501/Streaming-music-service-Grooveshark-goes-dark
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe