Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Another tough summer for Arctic sea ice

By / June 5, 2009

As of June 1, the Arctic Ocean's sea ice has melted back below the 1979-2000 average and at least for now appears to be inching toward the levels set in 2007. That year, sea ice retreated to its smallest melt-season expanse since satellite records began in 1979. Every year since 2002 has seen the sea-ice minimum fall below the 1979-2000 average.

National Snow and Ice Data Center


The annual melt-back of Arctic Ocean sea ice is deepening -- driven by the arrival of warmer weather and the thinness of the winter ice that rebuilt after last summer's melt.

Skip to next paragraph

Recent posts

As of the latest readings posted at the National Snow and Ice Data Center on June 1, it looks for the moment like the melt-back's pace is flirting with the 2007 record.

How much farther the ice will retreat this year remains an open question. Scientists at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo., say much depends on seasonal weather patterns through summer's end.

May's decline was about average, the center notes. But given the thinness of the ice that emerged from winter and its growing predominance over hardier multi-year ice, NSIDC researchers say they expect 2009 to be another year when the amount of sea ice left at summer's end will fall short of the 1979-2000 average.

The decline of summer ice is driven by a mix of factors. Warmer waters move into the Arctic Ocean Basin from lower latitudes, for instance. And certain weather patterns, if they persist, can herd the broken ice out into the Atlantic like Rowdy Yates on the cattle trail.

But through it all, the underlying driver is widely seen as global warming, over whose long-term trend these other, more variable factors are superimposed.

So, if you're not into polar bears, who cares?

Well, a couple of recent studies suggest that a persistent deep decline in summer ice has a measurable effect on regional climate patterns at far lower latitudes the following fall and winter. In short, if you live in most of the continental US (including the already parched West), Alaska, and northern Europe, don't look for as much fall and winter rain and snow as you might otherwise get.

You can find a pdf copy of the formal research report, which has been published in Geophysical Research Letters, here. A modeling study by another group, and reaching somewhat similar conclusions, has been submitted for formal publication in the Journal of Climate.

These studies highlight a point that will crop up more frequently over the next few years: Like politics, in the end all climate is local. Global averages are useful benchmarks up to a point. But when it comes to global warming, the intensity of specific effects that people will have to cope with in specific locations will depend on a range of local and regional conditions -- from how close you live to the ocean or to major mountain ranges to the type of land-use practices people have evolved where you live.

We'll have more on this in future posts, but for now, let's stick with the potentially long reach of conditions in the Arctic.

Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story