What’s happening with the San Andreas fault?

A new study finds that areas along the southern San Andreas fault are rising and falling, reflecting centuries-long buildups of seismic energy that could potentially trigger a major earthquake.

|
Mark Rightmire/AP
Water bubbles up through the Los Angeles pavement in March 2014, following an 5.1 earthquake. A new study shows that parts of California lying along the San Andreas fault are sinking, while others are rising at the same rate.

Parts of California lying along the San Andreas fault are sinking, while others are rising at the same rate, according to a new study published in journal Nature Geoscience on Monday. The underlying causes of that movement, say researchers, will eventually culminate in a major earthquake.

"Once there is a major event, all of that energy gets released," said Sam Howell, the study's lead author and PhD candidate in geophysics at the University of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM), in an interview with the Los Angeles Times.

Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo as well as parts of San Bernardino county, the study found, were among the 125-mile "lobes" where the land was rising. In Orange County, the Los Angeles Basin, Bakersfield, and San Diego County, the opposite effect was occurring, with those areas falling a few millimeters per year.

Mr. Howell added that it is "pretty much impossible to say" when an earthquake would occur next. But the study, which used GPS data from an observatory that tracks seismic information on the Pacific and North American tectonic plates, will help scientists better understand how the fault line's behavior might affect the region around it.   

"While the San Andreas GPS data has been publicly available for more than a decade," said Howell in a press release accompanying the study, the question of whether terrain was moving vertically had been ignored in previous research because of "difficulties in interpreting the noisy data." 

The vertical motion of Earth's surface is subject to local, short-term variables that often prove tough to control for in studies, such as the pumping of groundwater, local surface geology, and precipitation levels.

By making use of a new statistical technique, Howell and his team were able to "break down the noisy signals to isolate a simple vertical motion pattern that curiously straddled the San Andreas fault," he said.

In doing so, added co-author Bridget Smith-Konter, associate professor at UHM, the team was able "to confirm that the buildup of century-long earthquake cycle forces within the crust" were responsible for the pattern.

The San Andreas fault is considered California's most dangerous fault line, but the last major event along it came in 1906, when San Francisco was hit by a 7.8-magnitude earthquake. In the southern part of the fault, though, it's been about a century and a half since a big earthquake, and for areas south of Los Angeles, three centuries have passed.

Smithsonian Magazine noted in 2015 that stresses along the fault have built up over the years.

"We think Southern California is locked and loaded, that the stresses have really built up," US Geological Survey seismologist Ned Field told the Smithsonian at the time, "and when things start unleashing, they could unleash for years."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What’s happening with the San Andreas fault?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0622/What-s-happening-with-the-San-Andreas-fault
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe