Saturn's ring mystery: Why are opacity and density mismatched?

A new analysis contributes to a body of research aimed at uncovering the mass and origin of the planet's rings.

|
NASA/JPL-Caltech
Artist's illustration of NASA's Cassini spacecraft flying by Saturn's icy moon Enceladus.

In studying the mass of Saturn’s rings, astronomers have stumbled on a surprising finding: more opacity does not necessarily mean more mass, as one might expect.

"Appearances can be deceiving," Phil Nicholson, an astronomy professor at Cornell University, said in an announcement.

"A good analogy is how a foggy meadow is much more opaque than a swimming pool, even though the pool is denser and contains a lot more water," explained Dr. Nicholson, who participated in a recent analysis of data collected by the Cassini spacecraft mission.

Astronomers are trying to determine the density of Saturn’s rings to figure out how old they are and how they formed. In this analysis, they looked at the density of Saturn’s B Ring, the largest and most opaque of them all, and made of billions of particles of mostly water ice. They found that levels of opacity were different across the width of the B Ring, even while the mass did not vary much along this span.

This phenomenon had already been observed in studies of Saturn’s other rings, leading scientists to conclude that there’s little correlation between a ring’s opacity and the amount of particulate material it contains.

Scientists had already proposed that the B Ring has less mass than its opacity would indicate, but this new analysis is the first to measure the ring and confirm this to be true.

Now scientists just have to figure out why this is the case.

"At present it's far from clear how regions with the same amount of material can have such different opacities,” Matthew Hedman, the study's lead author and a physics professor at the University of Idaho, said in an announcement.

“It could be something associated with the size or density of individual particles, or it could have something to do with the structure of the rings," he said.

By analyzing spiral density waves in the ring, scientists were able to determine its mass. These waves are created by gravity from Saturn and from its moons as it tugs on the particles. The shape of the wave is informed by the amount of mass in the part of the rings where the wave is located, researchers say.

"By 'weighing' the core of the B ring for the first time, this study makes a meaningful step in our quest to piece together the age and origin of Saturn's rings," Linda Spilker, a Cassini project scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., said.

"The rings are so magnificent and awe-inspiring, it's impossible for us to resist the mystery of how they came to be," she said.

Cassini scientists say that the mass of the B Ring is unexpectedly low, considering that it’s significantly more opaque than other, denser rings. To them, B Ring's low mass is an indication that it’s young by space standards, maybe a few hundred million years instead of a few billion. This is because astronomers expect that rings with less mass must have evolved faster than denser rings.

More research in 2017 is expected to confirm the rings' mass measurements, say astronomers, when Cassini is due to measure the mass of only Saturn as it completes its mission there. Cassini had already measured Saturn's gravity field, which helped determine the mass of the planet and its rings. Next year, astronomers will take the difference between the two measurements to confirm the mass of the rings.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Saturn's ring mystery: Why are opacity and density mismatched?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0204/Saturn-s-ring-mystery-Why-are-opacity-and-density-mismatched
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe