Why is this supernova so bubbly?

Cassiopeia A, a supernova that exploded 340 years ago, seems to a bubbly interior, and scientists now think they know why.

|
NASA/CXC/SAO
Buried under layers of glowing, multi-colored gas, at the heart of supernova remnant Cassiopeia A, are massive caverns carved out by radioactive metal, according to new research.

Bubbles of radioactive metal may have punched holes in the heart of a nearby supernova, according to new observations.

The inner layers of Cassiopeia A, a supernova that exploded 340 years ago, bears evidence of enormous caverns, where material has been cleared away. The authors of the new research theorize that expanding bubbles of radioactive nickel could have created the holes.

Studying the bubbly interior could help scientists understand why supernovas pop their corks in the first place. Exploding stars are responsible for creating and spreading heavy elements to the cosmos, providing planets like Earth with a great variety of building materials.[Supernovas: Amazing Photos of Star Explosions]

The bomb detective

Dan Milisavljevic, a postdoctoral researcher at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, wants to know why stars explode. He's studying the scene of a nearby stellar detonation: Cassiopeia A, located a mere 11,000 light-years from Earth, in the Milky Way galaxy.

"We're like the bomb squad," Milisavljevic says. "A bomb's gone off and I want to understand how that bomb exploded. So when I go in the room, the first thing I'm going to say is: Where did the debris go? Did it go in all directions equally or did it go in some directions preferentially, like a pipe bomb or something? That's step one. And that's what we've done here." 

The new paper by Milisavljevic and his co-author Rob Fesen of Dartmouth College, show that the wreckage of Cassiopeia A is not scattered arbitrarily. In its core there are cavernous structures that indicate a deliberate process.

Images of Cassiopeia A, or Cas A for short, taken by optical telescopes show a beautiful, multicolored shell of material around the former star. This material is lit up by energy from a shock wave that emerged during the initial explosion. Astronomers have trouble looking inside this shell, to the core of the explosion, because so many layers of dust surround it, and because it doesn't radiate as much light.

Milisavljevic and his co-author used a specialized instrument to look at Cas A through the Mayall 4-meter telescope at the Kitt Peak National Observatory. They looked for near-infrared light — which can penetrate dust — in a very small range of wavelengths. This region of light is sensitive to sulfur, which is common in Cas A.

It turns out, the scientists were looking in just the right place. The sulfur they observed in the inner regions held the shape of the bubbles, the way mud holds the shape of a footprint. They saw hollowed out caverns, as if the bubbles had pushed other material to the side, then popped and disappeared. 

The researchers believe the bubbles were formed by radioactive nickel. Once the star exploded, the material that made up the star's body began to hurtle outward. The new research and some previous work suggests that the dollops of radioactive metal would have moved out into this expanding cloud. The radioactive decay of that atoms would produce photons that would push outward on the surrounding material, forming the bubbles. A few weeks after the explosion, the bubbles would have become a permanent feature.

The shape of the bubbles, and the way they fit in the wreckage of the star, can be seen in an app created by one of the researchers that allows users to tour a 3D image of Cassiopeia A. (You can see the Cassiopeia A web app here.)

In addition, the researchers say the bubble theory could explain larger structures in Cas A, namely, large rings seen by optical and infrared telescopes in the outer regions of the remnant.

If radioactive nickel did create the bubbles, it would no longer be present in Cas A's remains — it will have decayed, or broken apart. But it may have left behind deposits of iron. Milisavljevic said the next step in confirming the theory will be searching for those iron deposits.

The messy insides of stars

Previous research has shown that nickel deposits could move faster than lighter elements as all the materialhurtles outward after the blast. This is consistent with the new findings.

The presence of the nickel bubbles could also indicate that material moves around inside the star before it explodes. According to Milisavljevic, prior models of stars just before they exploded into supernova usually painted a picture of a very tidy interior: all the elements remained separated into layers, with the lightest elements like hydrogen and helium on top, then carbon and oxygen, and finally iron. But scientists are beginning to think that things may actually be much messier.

"It may be that the star is quite turbulent inside," Milisavljevic said. "So it's not this onion skin interior. There may be some kind of mixing that's going on in the chemical layers of the star immediately prior to the explosion. And simulations have shown that if that's the case, then the explosion proceeds much more easily and that may be aiding in the explosion all together."

By studying the bubbles, scientists may get new clues about what happens inside a star as it is about to end its life with a brilliant bang.

Follow Calla Cofield @callacofield. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article onSpace.com.

Copyright 2015 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why is this supernova so bubbly?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0130/Why-is-this-supernova-so-bubbly
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe