Will 'cosmic inflation' discovery stand the test of time?

The March 17 announcement that researchers have detected signs of gravity waves has come under fire, as some scientists have cautioned that galactic dust could be interfering with the measurement.

By , SPACE.com Contributor

  • close
    Gravitational waves from inflation create a twisting pattern in the polarization of the cosmic microwave background, called a "curl" or B-mode pattern. The actual B-mode pattern observed with the BICEP2 telescope appears here.
    View Caption

One of the most ballyhooed astrophysics findings in recent memory has come under fire recently.

In March, a team of researchers announced that they had found evidence of primordial gravitational waves, ripples in space-time from the universe's earliest moments. But other scientists have already begun questioning the discovery, suggesting that it may simply be the signature of dust in our own Milky Way galaxy.

"The detection of gravity waves would be the most important physics result of the 21st century," theoretical astrophysicist David Spergel of Princeton University said earlier this month at the 224th American Astronomical Society meeting in Boston. [The Big Bang to Now in 10 Easy Steps]

Recommended: Are you scientifically literate? Take our quiz

However, he added, "there is no statistical evidence for the claim that gravity waves have been seen."

The evidence for inflation

Most scientists think that in the first 10-35  seconds — roughly one-trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second — after the Big Bang, the early universe experienced a rapid expansion known as inflation. In this brief moment, space-time exploded outward far faster than the speed of light. The universe continues to expand today, but at a far slower pace.

Strong evidence for inflation can be found in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the light left over from the Big Bang. Temperature variations in the CMB, which pervades the entire sky, are minor, suggesting that the universe initially came from a small region of space, researchers say.

Spergel compared the relative uniformity of the CMB to teaching a class in which all students hand in identical exams.

"That suggests there has either been communication in the room, or some information shared at the beginning," he said.

If information were shared across space-time to maintain similar conditions, it would have to travel almost instantly across vast stretches of the universe, a process most scientists consider unlikely.

Inflation would have left its mark on the CMB in the form of gravitational waves, distortions in space-time, the idea goes. Teams of researchers around the world have thus been searching for "B modes," a type of polarization in the CMB predicted to be generated by primordial gravitational waves.

Pernicious dust

In March, a team led by John Kovac, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, reported that they had likely detected B modes using the Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization (BICEP2) telescope in Antarctica. The discovery was lauded as the first direct evidence for the occurrence of cosmic inflation. [Cosmic Inflation and Gravitational Waves: Discovery Images]

Spergel said that, on hearing the news, he was "excited but doubtful about the results."

His initial trepidation arose from the fact that the measurements made by the BICEP2 team were only taken in a single-energy frequency. Spergel asserted that at least three frequencies are required for a solid detection.

Observations in a single band can set limits on gravitational waves, but "it's very difficult to make a convincing detection," he said.

Another issue with the reported detection stems from the fact that dust in the Milky Way galaxy can scatter microwaves, creating a similar polarization pattern as that produced by gravitational waves — an effect that can be subtracted out.

"Dust has turned out to be an even more pernicious problem than many of us thought years ago," Spergel said.

The BICEP2 team made their measurements in one of the most polarized regions of the sky, and Spergel contends that the researchers didn't sufficiently subtract out the contribution from foreground dust emission.

The team relied on the preliminary findings on cosmic dust reported in a conference talk by scientists leading Europe's CMB-mapping Planck mission, rather than on published data. (This was the best possible option, BICEP2 team members have said; full Planck data will not be released until November.)

The BICEP2 team estimated that only 3.5 to 5 percent of the dust in the sky is polarized, but a large fraction of the sky suggests that the actual polarization figure is above 7 percent, Spergel said.

"I think it is optimistic to assume the polarization is much less," he said.

'A very sensitive record'

Spergel is not the only scientist to express doubts about inflation's "smoking gun." Since its release, the BICEP2 results have come under a great deal of scrutiny from other scientists.

But whatever ends up happening, Spergel says the findings are important and will help scientists further understand gravitational waves.

"The BICEP measurement will be a very important measurement at 150 Gigahertz," Spergel said, referring to the frequency of the 512 detectors responsible for capturing the data.

The finding also illuminates an important lesson — the need to validate a result at several different frequencies, which would provide more robust evidence for detections from the early universe.

"We are entering a very exciting period of time for cosmologists hoping to detect gravity waves," Spergel said. "I think the BICEP team should be recognized for having made a very sensitive record, for pushing the field forward."

Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

Copyright 2014 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Share this story:
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...