Long in the tooth? Great white sharks can live to a ripe old age, study finds.

Using radiocarbon dating instead of counting rings in vertebrae suggests that great white sharks in the northwest Atlantic can live as long as humans, not just into their 20s, as previously had been thought.

|
Bruce Sweet/www.SportFishingMA.com/ AP Photo
A juvenile great white shark swimming in the Atlantic Ocean about 20 miles off the coast of Gloucester, Mass., in the rich fishing ground known as Stellwagen Bank. New research suggests that Atlantic great whites can live as long as humans.

New research into the life spans of great white sharks in the northwest Atlantic indicates that the apex predators can live as long as humans – at least into their 70s, and nearly three times as long as previously thought.

Until recently, sharks’ ages typically were determined by counting growth bands in the their vertebrae, similar to those found in trees. This technique had led marine biologists to believe that great whites only live into their 20s.

“It’s not an easy thing to read band pairs on shark vertebrae,” says Lisa Natanson, a fisheries biologist in the Apex Predators Program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Northeast Fisheries Science Center, and a lead author of the study published online Wednesday in PLOS ONE, a peer-reviewed, open-access scientific journal.

“It’s not like tree rings, where everybody knows for sure what band pairs look like and what they mean in terms of how often they are deposited. Every species [of shark] is completely different, so you have to start from scratch when defining the criterion for counting a band pair.”

Examining vertebrae archived at the National Marine Fisheries Service in Narragansett, R.I., Dr. Natanson initially began counting band pairs to determine the age of four female and four male sharks caught in the northwest Atlantic between 1967 and 2010.

While other researchers had counted the bands visible on x-rays, Natanson examined actual vertebrae. She soon identified additional rings within each band. When she counted those rings, she came up with much higher estimates for the predators’ ages. That’s when she decided to use radiocarbon dating to test the efficacy of each of the counting methods.

Radiocarbon dating – not to be confused with the carbon dating of fossils – relies on the known persistence of carbon isotopes left over in the ocean from nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s and 1960s.

By taking core samples from several points on the vertebrae and comparing the amount of radiocarbon in each sample with the established knowledge of the radiocarbon's persistence in the environment, Natanson and her colleagues were able to determine the actual age of the 8 sharks sampled.

“Not only were my higher band counts closer, but they weren’t even high enough,” she says.

The radiocarbon dating indicated that the oldest of the female samples had lived to be 40 years old, and the oldest male lived to be 73. Because the sample size was small, just four of each gender, Natanson does not believe this is any indication that males live longer than females. It just so happens that this particular male lived much longer than that particular female.

She also believes it likely that there are even older great whites swimming around in the northwest Atlantic.

“These are lower-end estimates because these are not the biggest white sharks that we’ve found out there swimming,” she says. “They are just the biggest ones that we have samples of.”

Because the sharks sampled all came from the northwest Atlantic – most were caught off Long Island and one was caught near Prince Edward Island – this does not necessarily mean that other great whites in other oceans or even other parts of the Atlantic have similar life spans.

“People say a white shark is a white shark is a white shark, but that’s just not true,” she says. “We are finding that the same species [of sharks] from different areas have different parameters and different longevities.”

While we know a great deal about other shark species, marine biologists know little about great whites. Scientists disagree on just how many sharks are swimming in the world’s oceans. As apex predators that feed at the top of the food chain, their numbers are low. Sharks currently are considered endangered and are listed as a prohibited species.

This new information can help to inform sustainable management of great white shark populations by offering insight into the number of pups that females typically produce in their lifespan.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Long in the tooth? Great white sharks can live to a ripe old age, study finds.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/0109/Long-in-the-tooth-Great-white-sharks-can-live-to-a-ripe-old-age-study-finds
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe