Samsung Galaxy phones v. Apple iPhones? In court, advantage Apple.

Samsung Galaxy phones and Apple iPhones and iPads will be exhibits A and B in a US patent case that begins July 30. Despite Samsung Galaxy phones' lead in the marketplace, Apple has the upper hand in court.

|
Ahn Young-joon/AP/File
In this 2011 file photo, a Samsung Galaxy phone, left, and Apple's iPhone 4 are displayed at a mobile phone shop in Seoul. Two tech titans are squaring off in federal court July 30 in a closely watched trial over patents and control of the worldwide smartphone and computer tablet markets.

As Apple and Samsung Electronics head to the courts in the United States on Monday in a technology-patent trial that has a lot at stake for both firms, one intellectual property expert tells CNBC that Apple is in a stronger position than its Asian rival.

“Even though the jury trial hasn’t started, it has already in a way, because the jury has been told that it can draw an adverse inference from the fact that Samsung failed to avoid the auto deletion of emails that Apple later sought as evidence. That’s going to have an immediate impact on Samsung’s credibility,” Chris Baxter, Principal at Baxter IP in Sydney, told CNBC Asia’s “Squawk Box”.

 Last week Apple won court permission to tell the jury that Samsung destroyed emails that it wanted to use as evidence in the trial. At this trial, Apple is seeking about $2.5 billion in damages.

 A 10-member jury trial will now take place in San Jose, California. Apple claims that South Korea’s Samsung copied the design patents of the iPhone and iPad, while Samsung contends that it has relevant patents of its own and produced many basic smartphone technologies first.

 Baxter adds that, “Samsung (also) failed to challenge the validity of Apple’s design patents to avoid a preliminary injunction, so I suppose Apple is off to a strong start but both sides are bringing forward some interesting evidence.”

 Samsung faces a potential sales ban on products such as its Galaxy S III smartphone and tablet computers. For Apple, the trial is seen as a key test of its strategy on patent litigation globally.

 Smartphones are key to both Apple and Samsung, which together account for more than half of smartphone sales worldwide.  Samsung on Friday reported a record $5.9 billion profit for the April-June quarter, boosted by booming sales for its Galaxy S phone, while Apple delivered a rare earnings miss for the its fiscal third quarter.

Stiff Competition

Melissa Chau, Research Manager, Client Devices, for research house IDC Asia-Pacific, says the outcome of the trial is unlikely to impact Apple or Samsung in terms of their market share in the mobile phone market over the long-term.

“It doesn’t really matter who wins,” she said. “While they contest these patents, Samsung will be doing things to make sure that new products do not infringe patent laws.”

Chau added that if Apple is successful, this could have an impact on products Samsung ships over the next 6 months but further out, the impact would be reduced as newer products are launched.

“The battle between Apple and Samsung is a long-term one and this trial won’t change the nature of competition between the two,” Chau said.

Baxter adds there is a chance Apple and Samsung could reach an eleventh-hour settlement.

“The problem is that both sides are polarized in terms of the value they put on each other’s patents,” Baxter said. “Whichever party loses will probably appeal but they would probably do well to reach some middle ground,” he added. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Samsung Galaxy phones v. Apple iPhones? In court, advantage Apple.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0730/Samsung-Galaxy-phones-v.-Apple-iPhones-In-court-advantage-Apple
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe