Jedi knights of online privacy strike back at data-mining empires

Firms such as CloudCapture, which launched Wednesday, and Abine, which debuted its 'Do Not Track Plus' app in February, see a ripe opportunity to turn the technology developed to mine personal data into a tool consumers can use to fight its abuse.

This has been dubbed “the year of Big Data,” meaning a time when online firms such as Facebook and Google are capitalizing on an unprecedented and vast amount of personal, user-generated information.

But the rush to corral, and monetize, that data is also fast ushering in a new digital management industry built around growing worries over the loss of personal privacy.

“Every day consumers are beginning to pay more attention to this issue,” says Rob D’Ovidio, an associate professor of criminal justice and an expert on Internet security at Drexel University in Philadelphia. As more services to tackle the topic appear, “they will not only give consumers new tools but they will play an educational role in pushing understanding of the larger privacy issues.”

Concerns have been escalating over what these Internet giants are doing with user data. Everyone from the White House and the Federal Trade Commission to the EU, and digital rights groups from the US to Europe, have been tussling with the problem of how to get online companies to respect consumers' privacy rights.

So far, voluntary moves by players such as Facebook and Google to address privacy concerns – notably a “Do Not Track” button that has no enforcement mechanism behind it – lack teeth, say critics.

Private companies such as Los Angeles-based CloudCapture, which launched Wednesday, and Abine, which debuted its “Do Not Track Plus” application in February, see a ripe opportunity to turn the same complex technology that was developed to mine personal data into a tool consumers can use to fight its abuse.

“This is a repeat of what we saw at the beginning of the Internet,” says Bill Kerrigan, chief executive officer of Abine, a four-year-old online security company based in Boston. “People slowly began to realize there were things going on all over the Internet they had no understanding about, and the antivirus industry was born.” The same “awareness-driving-adoption” cycle is now building behind privacy issues, he says.

“Just as people began demanding tools to fight computer viruses, they are now waking up to the need to protect their personal privacy online,” Mr. Kerrigan says. “We are at a point where consumers want someone working on their behalf.”

More than 580 different technologies are being used to track personal data, he notes. Indeed, 73 percent of people using the Internet consider it an invasion of privacy for a search engine to keep track of searches and use that information to personalize future search results, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center released this past week. Only 38 percent of the poll’s respondents had a general idea of what to do about data about them being collected online.

“Consumers are beginning to understand they need to address the issue,” Kerrigan says.

Abine’s new app and the newly launched CloudCapture focus on blocking automatic tracking and finding ways to give control back to the user.

“CloudCapture’s mantra is Block, Capture, Control,” says founder Alex Huf. “Now that they've been educated, it's time for users to take control without waiting for governments to do it for them.”

Both Abine and CloudCapture are installed in the user’s Internet browser and automatically block all online companies from tracking. Users can decide when and where to give out data.

However, “most consumers don’t understand the value of their personal data, and will willingly give up much in exchange for a quick return,” says Joseph Turow, professor at the Annenberg School for Communication and associate dean for Graduate Studies at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“We have to understand this from the perspective of the beginning of a century of big data,” he says, noting that it is not enough to simply put up intermediary companies. “People have to begin to engage with this issue and understand it, because data is the oxygen of the Internet,” he says, adding with a rueful laugh, “and if we don’t fully understand this it could suffocate us.”

Changing the paradigm is the beginning of understanding, says Huf.

“The embrace of disruption has always been part of our technology culture,” he says. “CloudCapture continues that trend by disrupting a monopoly the largest companies have on user data. It empowers the user to turn the tables and force everyone else to play by new rules.”

But tools cannot do all the work. Users must take responsibility for their own actions online, says communications professor Ananda Mitra of Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C.

“Would you stand in the middle of a ball field and use a megaphone to announce your last night’s drinking frenzy? Probably not,” he says via e-mail. Why would you do the same on a social media site? he asks. The issue is that “the user often forgets that what masquerades as 'interpersonal communication' is bordering on 'mass communication.' ”

In the end, he notes, “we need to be responsible for what we say and take the consequences of what we have said. Tools are mere software machines; we are the creators of the discourse.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Jedi knights of online privacy strike back at data-mining empires
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2012/0314/Jedi-knights-of-online-privacy-strike-back-at-data-mining-empires
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe