US proposes new oil train rules. Will they rein in spills?

The Obama administration proposed new safety rules on oil trains Wednesday after a string of recent incidents brought new attention to a growing method of oil transportation. As pipeline construction lags behind domestic oil production, energy companies are turning to rail to get their product to market.

|
Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press/AP/File
A file photo shows smoke rising from railway cars carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac Megantic, Quebec last year. The Obama administration unveiled new rules on oil trains Wednesday.

The US proposed new rules on oil trains Wednesday in an effort to improve the safety of transporting crude oil by rail across the the country. 

Domestic oil and gas production has boomed in recent years, causing energy companies to ship fuels via trains where pipelines are lacking or already at full capacity. That rise in oil by rail transportation has led to a string of recent high-profile explosions and accidents that have put a spotlight on the issue, particularly in communities through which these oil trains pass.

Wednesday's rules come in response to pressure on the administration to update regulations to match a growing industry. 

“Safety is our top priority, which is why I’ve worked aggressively to improve the safe transport of crude oil and other hazardous materials since my first week in office,” Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement. “While we have made unprecedented progress through voluntary agreements and emergency orders, today’s proposal represents our most significant progress yet in developing and enforcing new rules to ensure that all flammable liquids, including Bakken crude and ethanol, are transported safely.”

The Department of Transportation's proposed rules call for better braking systems and tighter speed controls. They also aim to phase out older tankers within two years, or require that they be retrofitted with newer design standards. The proposals will undergo a 60-day public comment period before they are finalized. 

Rail associations and oil industry groups tout new safety advances and have largely welcomed the administration's new safety push. But they warn that too many restrictions would slow the economic development that has come with a resurgence in US oil. They also challenge assertions that the lighter, newer oil coming from North Dakota is more dangerous to transport than other crudes.

“Knowing that more can always be done, our focus is and always has been on enhancing safety by addressing accident prevention, mitigation and response in a comprehensive manner," Jack Gerard, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, an oil-and-gas industry association, said in a statement Wednesday. “The government can and should take steps to ensure greater safety without stalling the energy renaissance that is creating good jobs, growing our economy and improving America’s energy security."

In 2008, US railways carried 9,500 carloads of crude oil across the country, according to the Association of American Railroads. By 2013, that number jumped to 407,761 carloads. While the overall safety record of US railways has improved over recent decades, the number of oil spills has increased dramatically due to the oil boom.

Between 1975 and 2012, US trains spilled about 800,000 gallons of crude oil, according to an analysis of federal data done by McClatchy Newspapers. That figure soared to more than 1.15 million gallons in last year alone. Recent incidents have also had a higher profile: Last July, an oil train explosion in Quebec killed 47 people. An oil train crashed in Alabama last November, sending flames 300 feet into the night sky and spilling thousands of barrels into a swamp.  

Environmental groups had mixed reactions to Wednesday's proposals, with some saying the new rules wouldn't do enough to protect communities from the transport of flammable liquids.

"[The Obama administration] severely underestimated the threat of these trains to the American public," Matt Krogh, a campaigner for ForestEthics, a San Francisco-based advocacy group, said in a statement Wednesday. “These are the heaviest, most dangerous trains on American tracks and they now pass through nearly every downtown in North America. The worst of these oil tanker cars are unsafe at any speed -- they should be banned immediately, not years down the line."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to US proposes new oil train rules. Will they rein in spills?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2014/0723/US-proposes-new-oil-train-rules.-Will-they-rein-in-spills
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe