Steven Chu to resign from top post at Energy Department

Steven Chu, who will step down from his post as Energy secretary, made renewables a centerpiece of his tenure. While advances in wind and solar garnered praise from Democrats, Republicans excoriated Steven Chu and the Obama administration when clean-energy investments backfired.  

|
Evan Vucci/AP/File
Energy Secretary Steven Chu testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Mr. Chu will earn the title of longest-serving Energy secretary by the time he officially steps down.

Steven Chu announced Friday he will resign his position at the Department of Energy, after serving four contentious years as Energy secretary.

The Nobel-Prize-winning physicist made renewables a centerpiece of his tenure. But while surges in wind and solar installations garnered praise from Democrats, Republicans excoriated the Obama administration when clean-energy investments backfired.  

In a lengthy resignation memo to his staff, Mr. Chu ticked off what he counts as the department's accomplishments under his lead: increased investment in high-risk, high-reward energy technology development; a doubling in production of clean, renewable energy from wind and solar; and more than $90 billion in Recovery Act loans to green energy companies.

When Solyndra, a solar panel manufacturer backed by $535 million in federal loan guarantees, filed for bankruptcy in 2011, critics of investments in private energy firms pounced. Chu downplayed the incident, saying that only 1 percent of the more than 1,300 companies funded by DOE Recovery Act funds went bankrupt. 

"The test for America’s policy makers will be whether they are willing to accept a few failures in exchange for many successes," Chu wrote in his letter Friday. "America’s entrepreneurs and innovators who are leaders in [the] global clean energy race understand that not every risk can – or should – be avoided."

Chu said he will remain in the post at least through February and until a new secretary is selected. 

When then President-elect Obama nominated Chu in 2008, he bucked a trend of appointing politicians or industry leaders to the post. The choice sparked optimism among academics who felt they had one of their own as the nation's top energy administrator.

"His appointment should send a signal to all that my administration will value science," Mr. Obama said at the time. "We will make decisions based on facts, and we understand that the facts demand bold action."

Indeed Chu, formerly the director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, won praise from many corners for the implementation of smaller, focused programs like energy efficiency block grants, the weatherization assistance program, the advanced research projects agency - energy.

But some say Chu's lack of experience inside the beltway overshadowed his wealth of experience outside it.  

"Obama tapped the Nobel physicist to lead his fight to stop global warming and transform the nation’s energy economy but the broad climate bill the president hoped would become part of his legacy never made it through Congress," the National Journal reported Friday, "and Chu later found himself embroiled in the political controversy over the bankrupt solar company Solyndra."  

Chu, who will earn the title of longest-serving Energy secretary by the time he officially steps down, takes the long view.

"Just as today’s boom in shale gas production was made possible by Department of Energy research from 1978 to 1991, some of the most significant work may not be known for decades," he wrote in his resignation letter. "What matters is that our country will reap the benefits of what we have started."

The president has not yet named a successor, but Politico lists former North Dakota Sen. Byron Dorgan, former Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter, former Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire, and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm as potential candidates. All of them are onetime politicians.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Steven Chu to resign from top post at Energy Department
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/0201/Steven-Chu-to-resign-from-top-post-at-Energy-Department
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe