- Why a Saudi blogger faces a possible death sentence for three tweets
- America's big wealth gap: Is it good, bad, or irrelevant?
- Xi Jinping, future Chinese president, faces test on first White House visit (+video)
- Iran accuses Israel of setting up attacks on its own diplomats
- Valentine's Day: cost of romance rising for flower delivery, 4 other things
- No budget? No problem! The strange politics behind a budgetless America.
Solar power vs. geothermal: Which works better?
In a 'green' home renovation, choosing a heating system comes down to deciding which is better, geothermal or leased solar panels.
As I learn about green options as we renovate Sheep Dog Hollow, I have definitely tripped and stumbled along the way.
Skip to next paragraphAlexandra writes about the 'green' and budget-friendly renovation of a 100-year-old farmhouse in south-central Connecticut.
Recent posts
-
04.27.10
Green renovation: Lessons learned -
04.23.10
Sheep Dog Hollow's green renovation is almost finished -
04.21.10
How to determine if wind power is for you -
04.15.10
Wind power in New England: Is it a good renovation option? -
04.09.10
The spacemen cometh: How spray-in insulation creates a leak-free building
In my most recent post, I noted what could have been my biggest wrong-footed move to date: choosing an expensive geothermal heating system when I could have leased a solar system for the cost of my monthly electric bill – at least, that’s how it seems on the surface.
But like all things green and cutting edge, the situation is more complex than it first appears.
Let me set the stage, though. The man from our local solar leasing company came to give a quote for our current home and was clearly taken aback when I mentioned that we had chosen geothermal for the house we’re renovating.
“Wow, that could cost you,” he said. “Your monthly electric bills could be pretty high.”
Since the geothermal system had already cost about $20,000 more than a traditional heating system, I was not pleased to hear his analysis of why it would also cost more to operate monthly than solar.
His reasoning went this way: Geothermal systems use a compressor and a heat pump to circulate the piped warm water from beneath the ground into the house and raise its temperature to a toasty 72 degrees F. That’s similar to what’s used in a central air conditioning system (but backwards and in winter.)
Since we don’t have central air conditioning, I was stunned to hear that during the summer, people who do have it can see their electric bills spike to $400 or $500 month.
“Same thing is happening with geothermal," he said. "You’re running a pump and a compressor all of the time, and you get consistently high electric bills, but for 12 months, not just during summer. So you have to be prepared for that. Some people in this area with geothermal have had $500-a-month electric bills.”
That might be true, but they’re also not paying $600 dollars a month in winter to keep their heating oil tanks full.
Nonetheless, his sales pitch got me. With the solar lease program, we could have put in a solar system for zero down. I couldn’t help but slap the palm of my hand to my head and think, “What have I done?”
(That’s especially true because my fiancé, Martin, was adamantly opposed to geothermal and I had prevailed upon him. If this was true about solar, I’d never hear the end of it.)
After the solar man left, I called Ray Sima, who had put in our geothermal wells. He and his family have been using geothermal heat here in chilly New England for the past 20 years.








These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.