Could leopard be more endangered than previously thought?

In a new study, a team of scientists recommends upgrading the threat status of leopards, who now occupy only a fraction of their once expansive terrain.

|
Dinuka Liyanawatte/Reuters
Leopards cross a dirt road before heading into a jungle at the Yala National Park in Sri Lanka. Leopard populations are declining much more rapidly than previously believed, according to a study released Wednesday.

Leopards occupy less than one-third of their historic range and need increased international protections, according to a study published in PeerJ on Wednesday.

The study's authors are calling for the the International Union for Conservation of Nature to raise the leopard's threat status from "near threatened" to "vulnerable" on the widely respected Red List.

Upgrading the leopard's status could spur conservation efforts to save the big cat, as has happened for other charismatic species who have seen their populations rebound because of their Red List classifications.

"Our next steps in this very moment will determine the leopard's fate," Andrew Jacobson, the study's lead author, told National Geographic. "The international conservation community must double down in support of initiatives protecting the species."

The organization is expected to reclassify the animal this year, reported National Geographic.

The study challenged the widely held perception that leopards are the most adaptable and hardiest of the big cats.

As the most comprehensive global study of the leopard population to date, it argues the animal's broad geographic range, adaptability, and elusiveness have fed the misconception the animal is not as threatened as other keystone carnivores, such as the African lion and Siberian tiger.

Despite their perceived resourcefulness, leopards occupy between 25 and 37 percent of their historic range, which spans across Eurasia and Africa, the researchers found. Its range has diminished from a historic high of 35 million square kilometers (an area twice the size of Russia) to 8.5 million square kilometers (an area the size of Brazil).

Although the leopard population is strong in some parts of southern and eastern Africa, the animal has all but disappeared in China, the Arabian peninsula and North Africa. Three subspecies – the Arabian leopard, the North Chinese leopard, and the Amur leopard – occupy just 2 percent of their historic ranges.

Human activities have driven to the leopard's decline, say the researchers. They list habitat destruction, illegal trade in leopard skin and parts, hunting smaller animals leopards prey on, revenge killings by farmers who have lost livestock, and trophy hunting in the few countries it is legal. 

Previous research by the IUCN has highlighted another threat to leopards: locals poisoning carcasses to target carnivores.

The authors of the new report say that reclassifying leopards' threat status could help restore its population, as evidenced by another, less predatory animal: the Arabian Onyx.

The onyx, a native of the Arabian peninsula, was on the brink of extinction before its classification on the Red List publicized major threats to it, which, when alleviated, allowed it to be reintroduced into the wild.

"It is a classic example of how data from the IUCN Red List can feed into on-the-ground conservation action," said Razan Khalifa Al Mubarak, director general of the Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi, in 2011.

Other researchers have found that leopards can survive in human-dominated landscapes that have some remaining cover and prey and under favorable governmental policy and a degree of public tolerance.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Could leopard be more endangered than previously thought?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2016/0504/Could-leopard-be-more-endangered-than-previously-thought
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe