Global warming: winners and losers in the Arctic's 'new normal'
The Arctic Report Card study suggests that changes at the top of the world have led to unusual weather patterns, a greener Greenland, and lots of plankton. At least the whales are pleased.
(Page 2 of 2)
The summer sea-ice minimum in 2011 was the second lowest on record, nearly matching the record low set in 2007.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The changes are many.
Some are as subtle as shifts in the shape of ice crystals in the snow covering high elevations on Greenland's Ice Cap, which can reduce the snow cover's ability to reflect sunlight back into space, explains Jason Box, a polar scientist at Ohio State University and a contributor to NOAA's report card.
For polar bears and walruses, the loss of summer ice can put them at a disadvantage. Out of 19 sub-populations of polar bears in the Arctic, seven are declining, with two of the seven declines linked to the loss of summer sea ice.
By contrast, plankton – food for other marine creatures – are increasing as less ice means more light reaches the ocean's upper layer, stimulating their growth.
Gray whales are moving into the Arctic Ocean and staying longer to feed on the increased plankton populations.
And it may be family-reunion time for bowhead whales. With open waters along Canada's Northwest Passage during the summer, bowhead whales from the Arctic Pacific and Arctic Atlantic have been observed sharing space in the passage – the first time the two populations have been observed to overlap.
Along the coasts, warmed by the release of heat the Arctic Ocean captures as well as by warm air circulating up from lower latitudes, plant life in coastal areas is shifting from moss and lichens to tall shrubs. Researchers say it's still unclear what effect this might have on caribou and reindeer populations, which rely on the moss and lichen for winter forage. The concern is that the shrubs increasingly will shade the mosses and lichens, depriving them of light.
In addition, the report notes that throughout the Arctic, permafrost is warming, even to depths of 20 meters (65 feet) below the surface. Arctic permafrost represents an enormous reservoir of carbon, mainly as methane. Molecule for molecule, methane is a far more-potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels and from land-use changes.
The full report, which runs 167 pages, documents a range of other changes in the region.
In the end, the Arctic remains the canary in the coal mine for global warming because warming's direct and indirect effects tend to amplify the changes taking place there more strongly than at lower latitudes, researchers say.
"Certainly with continued rising CO2 and temperatures, the changes in the Arctic will continue," says Jim Overland, a researcher at NOAA's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle.
But, he adds, several recent studies indicate that runaway changes are not inevitable. "It takes the continued forcing by CO2-increased temperatures, as part of the overall system, to continue the changes" researchers are noting in the Arctic.
Some models suggest that if CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are stabilized, "you stabilize the [Arctic] environment as well," he says.
Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.