Fishing ban brings species back to Mexico park. But can it rebuild a fishery?
A study finds that a fishing ban at a Mexican marine park – with critical help from local residents – has successfully restored the fish population. Whether it's enough to restore the industry is not clear.
(Page 2 of 2)
Colleague Tim Essington, another marine scientist at the University of Washington, says he is particularly struck by the breadth of the recovery up and down the food chain.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
That aspect "is quite surprising and remarkable," he says, noting that it probably indicates that stocks were severely depleted all along the chain.
While on a broad level the study's observations may be a no-brainer, the work represents the largest no-fishing zone studied to date, as a proportion of the park in which it is found.
After poring over past research results on the subject, the team found that some 80 to 90 percent of the reserves studied to date covered less than three square miles, and most of those covered less than half a square mile.
The 27-square-mile marine park in this study initially included a 13-square-mile official no-take zone – still the largest proportion of no-take zones for any of the 10 marine parks in the Sea of Cortez, Aburto-Oropeza explains. But with government backing, residents of Cabo Pulmo, some 100 strong, opted along the way to enforce the initial fishing ban across the entire park.
Cabo Pulmo National Park's success stands in stark contrast to conditions in nine other marine parks the Mexican government established in the Sea of Cortez between 1937 and 2007. All but one of these reserves have no-take zones. But none of those zones has shown any significant improvement in fish stocks.
Several ecological factors are likely to have contributed to Cabo Pulma's stunning recovery, the team speculates. The entire park is no-take, whereas other parks' no-take zones represent a much smaller proportion of the overall park. And in many of these parks, the no-take zones are fragmented. Cabo Pulmo's reefs remained healthy enough, despite overfishing, to serve as nurseries for young fish. And the park encompasses spawning areas for large predator fish.
But perhaps the most critical element in preventing Cabo Pulmo National Park from becoming a marine reserve in name only (as others have become) is the participation of locals in enforcing the ban – a move that appeared to be profitable to the tiny community.
A study conducted in 2006 showed that the village of Cabo Pulmo's economy pulled in just over $500,000 from its handful of small businesses that cater to vacationers. This gave the residents a per capita income of $18,000 – nearly double Mexico's national figure.
But while the study documents environmental benefits within the no-take zone, and it cites economic benefits for local residents, the researchers have yet to show that the effort can rebuild sustainable commercial fishing – the oft-cited reason for setting up no-take zones in the first place.
Yet this is a crucial step, notes the University of Washington's Dr. Essington.
"Demonstrating benefits to fishing, as opposed to conservation benefits, is always difficult but really important to fully judge the benefits of no-take marine reserves," he notes.
Aburto-Oropeza acknowledges the point, noting that this study was limited to assessing conditions inside the park. The next step is to see what effect the rebound has had on fish populations in surrounding waters.
He finds some encouragement in anecdotal reports from local fishing guides that just outside the park boundaries, visitors have been catching increasing numbers of top-of-the-food-chain fish, such as small tuna, wahoos, and bill fish.
Looking at the "spillover" effect from the park's recovery is one of the next projects on his agenda, he says.
RECOMMENDED: On emptying seas, a vanishing way of life