Good grades for girls’ education

With so much progress worldwide, the champions of better schooling for girls seek further gains. They have plenty of successful models and new sources of money.

|
Reuters
Girls attend a class at their school in a village outside Yemen's capital Sanaa Feb. 2.

The most powerful way to improve a society, says UNESCO Director General Irina Bokova, is to educate its girls better. If she’s right, the world is now a much improved place.

Since a global antipoverty campaign began in 2000, young girls have started to enroll in primary school at rates similar to boys. In addition, the number of primary-age children leaving school has fallen by an estimated 43 percent, according to UNESCO.

This progress, while uneven country to country, needs to be heralded simply to ensure that the task of providing a formal education to all girls is achieved. This cause does not lack for champions. First lady Michelle Obama is the latest, having launched a “Let Girls Learn” campaign last year. She hopes to continue it “for decades.” She follows in the footsteps of Malala Yousafzai, the young Pakistani who struggled for the right of girls to go to school, was then shot by the Taliban for speaking out, and won a Nobel Peace Prize for her efforts in 2014. (She is now busy studying in Britain.)

On Wednesday, the World Bank jumped on the bandwagon with a plan to spend $2.5 billion over five years to help adolescent girls stay in school. The money is targeted mainly in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where the hurdles for girls’ education remain high.

The big focus these days is to ensure girls continue through secondary school rather than drop out for early marriage or family work, or because their parents fear they might be sexually assaulted.

Last year, when the United Nations set new antipoverty goals for the year 2030, all countries for the first time committed to keep kids in secondary education. They also agreed to dedicate 4 to 6 percent of spending on education.

Such optimism is based in part on the many successful models for improving girls’ education.

One is to reduce the time that girls in poor villages spend fetching water each morning. Another is to give them bicycles for safer, quicker transport. In Kenya, a program discovered that providing school uniforms to sixth-graders reduced the dropout rate. Then there is the need to provide adequate toilets for girls at school.

Some countries, such as Morocco, pay parents to get their children to school, although such cash payments do not always work. A more effective method is to inform parents of available jobs in the area or showcase local women whose education brought them paid work.

Such incentives, however, come out of a larger change. As Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, another champion of girls, put it: “We have to change our thinking and stop believing that boys are superior to girls. We should change our mentality.”

That shift is well on its way worldwide, and yet it needs more money, champions, and models.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Good grades for girls’ education
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2016/0413/Good-grades-for-girls-education
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe