In a financial crisis, credibility counts

The three largest economies have faced financial crises since 2008. The US and Europe are recovering while China’s leaders must regain credibility after a stock-market snafu.

|
REUTERS
An investor looks at an electronic board showing stock information at a brokerage house in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, China, July 30.

In the past seven years, the world’s three largest economies – China, the United States, and Europe – have seen massive government intervention in financial crises. The US Federal Reserve bailed out Wall Street in 2008. The European Central Bank saved the eurozone in 2012. And in July, Chinese authorities spent more than $500 billion to prop up stock markets in Shanghai and Shenzhen that had lost a third of their value. These were heroic reactions and rare in history.

All three interventions were a test of credibility for leaders in their ability to manage a crisis as well as their understanding of economic fundamentals. Economics is hardly an exact science. It is laden with disputes over policy. Yet the one undisputed necessity is trustworthiness. Can regulators, central bankers, and others pull the right levers to restore and maintain confidence in an economy?

The US has steadily recovered from its crisis while the European Union appears on top of its troubles with its weakest economies, such as Greece. In China, however, the ruling Communist Party faces a long march to regain credibility. Over the past year it told Chinese to invest in stocks, only to create a financial bubble that finally burst in early July with the biggest drop in prices since 2007. Party leaders then used the brute force of state controls to stop the selling of stocks and to buy up shares.

These events have cast doubts on the ability of President Xi Jinping to bring about deep reforms, such as privatizing state-run enterprises and shifting capital to innovative companies. “Such actions put policy credibility and effectiveness into question,” stated Standard & Poor’s credit agency. At the least, the intervention goes against Mr. Xi’s pledge in 2013 to let market forces play the “decisive role” in the economy. 

Much of China’s economy remains sound. Only 7 percent of Chinese hold stocks compared with about half of Americans. But in a country whose leaders seek stability at almost any cost, the stock market crash shows the need to resolve a tension between market freedom and the party’s desire to control the economy for political ends.

In coming days, party leaders will gather for their annual summit at the Yellow Sea resort area of Beidaihe. This secretive enclave sets the agenda for the next five-year economic plan. To regain legitimacy, the party will need to make tough decisions on reforms that can restore the confidence of investors, both Chinese and foreign.

Credibility, like the value of a currency, is an invisible commodity, one built on the qualities of trust and competence. Prosperity depends on it. And it does not derive from power and authority but from wisdom and gentle persuasion. If the world’s three largest economies can master it, the global economy will be better off.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In a financial crisis, credibility counts
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2015/0730/In-a-financial-crisis-credibility-counts
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe