Subscribe
The Monitor's View

Ukraine can cleanse its past, heal its future

A new 'lustration' law may be too harsh and sweeping in fingering workers in past regimes for alleged wrongdoing. Curbing corruption and potential tyranny may require some leniency toward past officials who repent.

  • close
    Ukraine's new president, Petro Poroshenko, signs the law on "lustration" Oct. 9 in Kiev, eight months after the Maidan revolution against a corrupt regime.
    Reuters
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

In the past half century, as dozens of nations have overcome tyranny or conflict, many have tried to figure out how much to punish their past tormentors – or to forgive them, depending on their crimes, personal contrition, or civic usefulness.

Ukraine, with its democratic revolution now secured by two elections this year, is the latest country to face this moral predicament.

In October, it began to judge the past activities of as many as 1 million current or former government workers under a new law on “lustration” (Latin for “cleansing”). Hundreds of Ukrainians have already been fingered or dismissed, barred from public service for 10 years. Many were tied to the country’s Soviet-era security services or found to lead lifestyles far beyond their salaries.

Ukraine is in a rush to break an endemic culture of corruption and any lingering authoritarianism. While the urgency is understandable, its leaders must also learn from the mistakes of other countries that failed to find the right balance between retribution against previous rulers and the need for national reconciliation.

Ukraine’s lustration law builds on the mixed experience of similar efforts in other Eastern European nations after their revolutions. It will no doubt face legal challenges for not allowing a presumption of innocence or being too sweeping toward entire sets of civic servants.

But more than facing legal problems, the law should not lead to a further rupture of a country still facing rebellion in its Russian-speaking east and one that lies at the heart of big-power tensions between Russia and the West.

Iraq stands out as an example of how wholesale justice without individual leniency can sow the seeds for future conflict. After the American overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003, the entire ruling Baath Party was outlawed from serving in either public service or the Iraqi security forces. This created resentment among the country’s once-dominant Sunni minority and helped create conditions for the rise of the Islamic State militant group.

A positive example lies in South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission, which granted amnesty to those who told the truth about their misdeeds during the apartheid era.

Ukrainians are correct to deter corruption and dictatorship through punishment and accountability. But justice will not be served without some mercy for individuals who truly repent with full disclosure. The best justice entails a healing of relationships that can lead to a restoration of a peaceful society.

A law for “cleansing” must be aimed at an individual’s thinking as well as the individual’s past deeds. Ukraine must be rebuilt with all its citizens.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK