Subscribe
The Monitor's View

Best path for post-election Brazil

After a divisive campaign and President Rousseff's squeaker reelection victory, Brazil must follow Mexico's model and unite major parties behind a pact for reform.

  • close
    President Dilma Rousseff blows kisses to supporters as she celebrates her victory in Brasilia, Brazil, Oct. 26.
    AP Photo
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

In the past five months, three large yet poor democracies held elections for top leaders. In India last May, Narendra Modi won with an Obama-like slogan, “Yes, we will do.” In Indonesia, Joko “Jokowi” Widodo became president last week with “Yes, we can do it together.” 

In Brazil, however, President Dilma Rousseff was reelected last Sunday with this slogan: “New government, new ideas.” 

Largely gone was the theme of her first campaign in 2010 about inclusiveness, or embracing all Brazilians for can-do progress. Ms. Rousseff won by a slim margin, the smallest since 1894. She now faces a Congress with 28 parties, up from 22. Much of southern Brazil, home to most of the country’s economic strength, voted against her, especially around São Paulo. Her campaign failed to bridge the deep divisions that erupted last year in mass protests over corruption and poor government services.

As a former Marxist guerrilla, Rousseff still uses the kind of language that divides people by class. She promises dialogue with her opponents, but in her victory speech, she failed to mention her opponent, Aécio Neves.

After a particularly divisive campaign, she must look to Mexico for what should be done. After that country’s election in 2012, the three main parties got together and agreed on a package of major reforms that have since passed. The leading Mexican politicians essentially said, “Yes, we can.”

Rousseff cannot afford to wait. Inflation is high, growth is near zero, and the state-run oil company, Petrobras, has not made good in delivering big offshore wells. And the ruling Workers’ Party, after 12 years in power and early success under President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva, now seems more entrenched than progressive.

Wealthier countries such as the United States can perhaps afford polarized politics for a while. But less-developed democracies need leaders who can both deliver results and do so by working with opponents. Brazilians deserve the “dialogue” that Rousseff promises with her opponents, who represent half of Brazil's nearly 200 million people. If it succeeds, it might serve as a lesson for Washington.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK