How China, Russia help spread democracy

Nations not in secure alliances of democracy take note when Russia annexes a piece of Ukraine and China shoots water guns at Vietnam's ships in a claim on the Paracel Islands. Security pacts based on common civic values can be strong deterrents.

|
AP Photo
In a photo released by Vietnam, a Chinese ship, left, shoots water cannon at a Vietnamese vessel, right, while a Chinese Coast Guard ship, center, sails alongside in the South China Sea, off Vietnam's coast May 7. Chinese ships are ramming and spraying water cannons at Vietnamese vessels trying to stop Beijing from setting up an oil rig in the South China Sea.

In the past two months, small countries with little or no democracy have learned a hard lesson on who will help them if they are attacked.

First in March, Ukraine stood helpless as Russian troops took over its Crimean Peninsula. Then this week, China sent dozens of ships into waters off Vietnam and began its first deepwater oil drilling in waters claimed by another country. The Chinese ships rammed Vietnamese Coast Guard vessels and fired water cannons at them.

Both acts of aggression have upended assumptions about the current world order between big powers. But most of all, they should refocus interest in the protection provided by alliances among countries that share the civic values of individual rights and freedoms.

Ukraine and Vietnam each lie next to giant countries, Russia and China, respectively. Yet they are not members in any mutual-defense treaty that binds many of the full-fledged democracies in Europe and Asia. Ukraine’s government remains in political limbo after the ouster of a corrupt, authoritarian ruler. And Vietnam’s ruling Communist Party suppresses almost all dissent. By not being in a democratic club, they are targets for expansion plans by their big neighbors.

Russia would think very hard before taking parts of Poland or the Baltic states, which are secure as democracies within NATO. And while Chinese maritime forces harass islands claimed by Japan and the Philippines, Beijing knows these democracies are part of a string of alliances around Asia backed by American power. For China, Vietnam remains the easiest pickings.

The strength of security pacts among democracies is not mainly in their warships and fighter jets. As President Obama stated in a 2011 swing through Asia, “the ultimate source of power and legitimacy [is] the will of the people.” That was the key lesson of World Wars I and II, and the cold war, but one not yet absorbed by many countries.

In a speech at NATO headquarters Wednesday, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe linked the Russian and Chinese aggressions. He suggested the transatlantic alliance still has a role similar to the one it had during the cold war. “The security environments surrounding Japan and Europe are once again becoming increasingly severe,” Mr. Abe said.

Vietnam has sought American military weapons to defend itself from China. But its poor record on freedom remains a stumbling block for the United States. In December, Secretary of State John Kerry announced a deal to help strengthen the Vietnamese Coast Guard. But it is only for $18 million. “Frankly,Vietnam needs to show a continued progress on human rights and freedoms, including the freedom of religion, the freedom of expression, and the freedom of association,” Mr. Kerry said bluntly during a trip to Hanoi.

In contrast, the Philippines and US signed a new agreement in April to boost their security alliance by allowing American forces to use bases in the Southeast Asian country. The new pact will boost the Philippines’ deterrent against China. The US and Japan have also beefed up their alliance since China has made new claims on the Senkaku Islands.

Mr. Obama’s “pivot” to Asia is often seen chiefly in military terms, such as moving more US ships and planes to the region. Yet the main US strategy is to boost democracy in the region, such as in Myanmar (Burma), Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. In Europe, too, the West seeks to bolster Ukraine’s plans for a May 25 election.

The best defense against aggression is intangible – the universal rights of freedom and a respect for the dignity of the individual. Nations that unite around those values have shown a strength that draws more nations to join them. Ukraine is now trying. Vietnam has a long way to go. But they have strong reasons to hurry up.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How China, Russia help spread democracy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2014/0508/How-China-Russia-help-spread-democracy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe