In sequester's austerity, will US echo Europe's politics of fear?

The enforced austerity of the eurozone crisis has roused surprising public anger. European governments are falling. The US need not follow this path if Washington finds a consensus over fiscal issues like 'the sequester.'

|
Reuters
Protesters hold masks during an anti-austerity and anti-corruption protest in Slovenia Feb. 8. The country's parliament dismissed the government of Prime Minister Janez Jansa on Feb. 27.

Americans, who face enforced austerity with the March 1 “sequester” of the federal budget, need only look across the Atlantic to see how they should not react to such spending cuts.

Europe is four years into its debt crisis, and last year it had appeared to be muddling through. But recent political instability in a few EU countries reveals a surprising level of public fear over dire economic conditions as well as anger toward elected leaders.

The results of Italy’s Feb. 24-25 election were the most telling. Voters overwhelmingly rejected the austerity policies of Prime Minister Mario Monti. But no one party received a winning endorsement, creating enough political instability to rattle markets and political confidence in the 17-nation eurozone.

On Feb. 27, the prime minister of Slovenia was ousted following massive protests in a nation that once was Europe’s shining new star but has seen its economy shrink by 2 percent.

And in the European Union’s poorest country, Bulgaria, the government quit last week after days of protests over austerity measures.

The weakening of Europe’s leadership through such public feelings of loss was also reflected in a New Year’s warning by French President François Hollande. He told France to expect almost no economic growth and rising joblessness. In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron had to offer a referendum on whether Britain should exit the EU, even as the nation’s triple-A debt rating was downgraded by Moody’s.

Last year, Europe thought it had seen the last of unplanned transitions in governments, which happened in Greece, Slovakia, and Romania. But while eurozone leaders were able to stem investor fears in financial markets, the Continent’s economy shrank at a 2.3 percent annualized rate toward the end of 2012.

Youth unemployment is rising, reaching nearly 25 percent. Budget deficits are surprisingly bigger than expected, even in thrift-minded northern European nations such as the Netherlands. Europe’s cherished social-benefits system is being whittled away.

Another political bellwether will be an election this September in the eurozone’s financial bulwark, Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel could be on the ropes if voters believe she has conceded too much in her insistence on austerity in Europe’s troubled economies.

Fixing the debt overhang in the EU may now be second in importance to addressing the public backlash to austerity and the ballot-box anger. Voters could continue to simply switch leaders in hopes of finding a solution to the Continent’s little or no economic growth.

America’s big, clumsy cut in its federal spending may not draw the same level of outrage. But lawmakers must learn from Europe that they are dealing with fear as much as budget items and anger as much as tax rates.

A public sense of vulnerability cannot be ignored. The first step in building confidence would be to find a political compromise on difficult fiscal choices. The last thing the United States needs is to import Europe’s instability.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In sequester's austerity, will US echo Europe's politics of fear?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2013/0228/In-sequester-s-austerity-will-US-echo-Europe-s-politics-of-fear
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe