The fear factor in attacks on Romney's Bain

Campaign attacks on Romney's former investment firm only play to worker fears about jobs. Candidates should play to hopes that workers can adapt to a rapidly changing economy.

|
AP Photo/Julie Jacobson
Buyers pass by the Kodak exhibit at the 2012 consumer electronics trade show in Las Vegas. Once a giant in photography, Eastman Kodak is a model in how not to adjust to challenges. The company may be headed for bankruptcy.

The GOP primaries have kicked up a campaign kerfuffle over Mitt Romney’s record as head of Bain Capital. This fall, if Mr. Romney is the Republican nominee, President Obama will also probably take a shot at the private equity firm.

Scratch down a bit further, however, and the real issue is a fear among many workers that they may not be able to adapt to rapid change in the economy.

Bain’s role in that economic churn has been to buy up distressed companies for investors. Old jobs are lost, new ones gained, all to achieve innovation, productivity, global market share, and ultimately profits. Preserving jobs that aren’t competitive is a low priority.

If a steel mill in Indiana can’t compete with China, it’s shuttered. If it can adapt to making a speciality steel, then retrain the workers, renegotiate a union contract, buy patents, and rebuild the mill, jobs are saved or created.

Most Americans understand that static companies fail. And now that a majority of workers are also capitalists – by owning company stocks through their retirement kitties – they also want efficiency and profits, just as Bain does. They can’t afford to be Luddites toward new technologies or isolationists about trade.

Yet many workers still face being either winners or losers. The ones who are displaced or who want out of low-wage jobs need help to retool themselves. Government provides some relief, such as retraining or low-cost public higher education. It can also adjust policies on trade, taxes, energy, research, housing, and transportation to help the economy be more competitive.

But come election season, candidates play to worker fears, engaging in “the paranoid style in American politics,” as historian Richard Hofstadter put it. Bain is described as a “vulture” capitalist that “kills” jobs even as Romney counterpunches with ads about the workers helped by Bain.

Bain is an easier and closer target than, say, China. That country’s rapid rise in the global economy has been far more disruptive to Americans.

In size, China has about four times more people. Its workers accept lower wages. And China’s entry into textiles, electronics, cars, and other manufacturing industries has forced the United States to move higher up the global economy’s food chain.

But many US workers aren’t equipped to move into the kind of industries where America is strongest, such as higher-level financial services, the latest digital and biological technologies, or speciality fields in education and health care.

China may yet become a big issue in the presidential campaign, just as Bain has. Romney himself refers to China as a “cheating” competitor. Indeed, the Chinese government has distorted free trade by its protectionist and mercantile policies.

But whether the issue is Bain or China, the deeper concern is worker fear about how to revamp for the future. Helping people adapt to an ever-changing economy should be the campaign issue.

Rather than play to fear, candidates need to offer ideas that inspire and comfort Americans about their ability to adjust to a new era.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The fear factor in attacks on Romney's Bain
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2012/0113/The-fear-factor-in-attacks-on-Romney-s-Bain
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe