Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

The Monitor's View

In Egypt and Tunisia, the rise of the Islamists?

The fear of freedom for Egypt, Tunisia, and other Arab countries is that it might give rise to the rule of extreme Islamists, creating Iranian-style theocracies. This fear does not match the reality.

(Page 2 of 2)

Instead, vast majorities, whether in Egypt, Jordan, or the Palestinian territories, favor democratic government. They agree that “the will of the people should be the basis of the authority of government,” according to PIPA’s poll in 2008. And in many Muslim countries, most people also support human rights such as freedom of religion, freedom of expression, and equal rights for women.

Skip to next paragraph

In 2009, the PIPA poll showed that 91 percent of respondents in Egypt and 83 percent in Indonesia (already a democracy) believe that democracy is compatible with Islam – even when compared to wording stating the opposite view, that democracy is not compatible because “it makes people the source of law rather than the Quran.”

Other polls support these findings, however it’s not so simple. Large majorities in the Muslim world also strongly identify themselves as Muslim and welcome the influence of sharia law on government (though it’s worth remembering that many democratic parties in Europe are affiliated with Christianity).

The apparent contradiction shows that the Muslim world is not sure how exactly to fit democracy with Muslim tradition or theology. That’s not surprising, given how little they’ve been allowed to experiment with it.

If one removed the lid of authoritarianism in the Middle East, and allowed parties of all stripes to develop, they would likely break down into three groups: secular parties and Islamist parties on the sides, with parties in the middle trying to bridge the two (such was the party that won the most seats in Iraq’s parliamentary elections last year). That middle spot is where most Muslims sit, and the bridging won’t be easy.

Yes, in a world of free elections in the Middle East, there is a risk that an extreme Islamist party could force its way to power. Or, as is feared with the Muslim Brotherhood, a party that professes to be moderate would change its stripes once it gained power, and then destroy democracy.

But, that pattern doesn’t match the overall hankering for freedom in the Muslim world. Opinion polls and feet on the ground show no desire to exchange a secular despot for a religious one.

What this implies for the Obama administration is not a leap of faith, but a leap of reason – something that the US president excels at. Just as Egyptians and Tunisians have lost their fear to demonstrate, the United States and other democracies must overcome their fear of Middle East democracy.


Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story