Readers Write: Consequences of climate change; US attitude adjustment on wildfires
Letters to the Editor for the September 2, 2013 weekly print edition:
Wildfires, natural gas and fracking, and Arctic development are closely linked to climate disruption, but the articles on those issues failed to mention that key connection.
Solutions to wildfires must address entitled-to-be-saved-from-myself attitudes in the US. If we continue like this, people will build on the lips of volcanoes and then demand to be saved.
Palo Alto, Calif. and Bismarck, N.D.
Consequences of climate disruption
The July 29 issue included several articles that relate to climate disruption. I thank the Monitor for that, but also urge you to be more diligent about including the consequences of climate disruption in any article that touches on the subject. Andrew Guzman's commentary ("US must fight climate change as it does terrorism") was particularly good.Skip to next paragraph
Gallery Monitor Political Cartoons
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Regarding the Focus article on "fracking" ("Europe eyes its natural gas"), it worries me that availability of natural gas in Europe could curtail Europe's push toward renewable energy. Natural gas is better than coal and oil in terms of greenhouse-gas emissions per kilowatt-hour or British thermal unit, but only if leakage of gases is controlled to very small amounts. The article should have pointed this out.
Wildfires and climate disruption are closely interrelated, but the article on wildfires ("Can we learn to live with fire?") doesn't mention that. Climate disruption sets up conditions for more wildfires. Wildfires put greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and accelerate climate disruption.
The commentary by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) of Alaska about opening up the Arctic for development also does not adequately discuss the negative consequences of climate disruption and seems to portray the warming of the Arctic as a good thing. What about when the permafrost in the tundra begins to melt and release vast amounts of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas? What about the loss of polar bears and other wildlife that depend on Arctic conditions?
William H. Cutler
Palo Alto, Calif.
Attitude adjustment on wildfires
Regarding the July 29 Focus article "Can we learn to live with fire?": Real solutions to destructive wildfires need to go deeper into the psyche and entitled-to-be-saved-from-myself attitudes growing in the United States. This dialogue needs to be about people knowingly building in areas of potential danger from fire or water. If we continue on the path we are taking, it stands to reason that, if there is a way, people will begin to build on the lips of volcanoes and then demand to be saved.