3 priorities for Pakistan's new government

After 14 years, Nawaz Sharif is back at the helm in Pakistan. The nuclear-armed country faces a welter of problems, from terrorism to tensions with Afghanistan, India, and the United States. To move Pakistan forward, Mr. Sharif  must focus on three priorities.

3. Foreign relations

While many of Sharif’s problems start at home, others are a consequence of Pakistan’s difficult neighborhood. His government takes office at a turning point in the American war in Afghanistan, with NATO forces drawing down and leaving Afghan units to take up the fight. Sharif and the Obama administration do not see eye-to-eye on the Afghan war, and they have been even more at odds over Washington’s drone-heavy counter-terror campaign in Pakistan.

In both cases, the short-term question is whether Sharif will pull Pakistan from cooperation with the United States. Far more likely, he will seek to renegotiate its terms so as to reduce his own exposure to public criticism for working too closely with Washington and to ensure that Pakistan is adequately compensated for what cooperation it provides.

Sharif will win points with Washington and take pressure off his own security forces by advancing a process of normalized relations with India. At the center of that process is relaxing trade restrictions in ways that would contribute to Sharif’s top goal of boosting the economy.

In sum, Sharif must capitalize on his victory to secure a few quick economic reforms while taking a magnanimous and steady-as-she-goes approach to a number of other domestic and international problems. Only then might he manage to build the momentum needed to address Pakistan’s daunting long-term problems.

Daniel Markey is a senior fellow at The Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., and is the author of “No Exit from Pakistan” (forthcoming, Cambridge University Press).

3 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.