4 smart ways to rebuild after superstorm Sandy

Early estimates of the damage from superstorm Sandy are staggering. In the days ahead, once people's immediate needs are met, we must focus on rebuilding. It is increasingly clear that rebuilding efforts must consider the following four points.

2. Development must restore natural infrastructure

We must rethink the way we reduce and manage the risks to our vulnerable coastal and river communities. As New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said, “We have a new reality when it comes to these weather patterns." He called for not only rebuilding the city, but using this opportunity to "build it back smarter."

What would "smarter" development look like?

In some places like lower Manhattan, engineered solutions – levees and seawalls – may well be necessary. Such structures have saved countless lives and reduced property damage in many communities across this country.

When it comes to protecting lives and property, shouldn't we use every tool available? As New York, New Jersey, the Caribbean, and other areas affected by Sandy begin the rebuilding process, one of their smartest investments may be in protecting, enhancing, and restoring the natural systems that provide a first line of defense against natural hazards. 

Nature can and should play an important role alongside engineered solutions. Natural infrastructure such as oyster reefs, healthy salt marshes, and intact sand dunes help reduce wave intensity and moderate the impacts on shorelines from flooding and erosion. Further inland, wetlands soak up excess water, helping to protect downstream communities from floods and filtering harmful agricultural runoff. And forested watersheds slow the rush of storm water heading downstream.

A good example of this approach is Cape May, N.J., where three communities have banded together to restore coastal dunes and wetlands to reduce flooding. While at the center of Sandy, this restored beach and wetland system appears to have spared the nearby communities from the kind of flooding they experienced before the restoration was completed.

2 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.