Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Opinion

Hey SCOTUS, we already have a federal mandate for health care

US law requires emergency rooms to treat patients regardless of their ability to pay. As a hospital CEO, I assure you, we already have a form of universal health care. We simply fund and supply it in an exorbitantly expensive way. Obamacare's individual mandate provides the solution.

By Brian E. Keeley / April 12, 2012

Supporters of President Obama's health-care reform law (known as Obamacare) rally in front of the Supreme Court March 27. As court justices debate the constitutionality of the law, op-ed contributor Brian Keeley defend's the law's 'individual mandate,' calling it 'a much better option to our current by-default health-care insurance system.'

Charles Dharapak/AP

Enlarge

Coral Gables, Fla.

The United States, the richest nation in the world, is the only advanced country without some form of universal health care for all its citizens. And the US now spends around 18 percent of its gross domestic product on health care – the highest percentage in the world.

Skip to next paragraph

So while the Supreme Court debates the constitutionality of the health reform law (aka Obamacare) and, more specifically, of its individual mandate, let me share my own perspective as the president and CEO of Baptist Health South Florida, a $3.6 billion not-for-profit health-care organization with seven hospitals, 30 outpatient centers, and 15,000 employees.

America already has a universal health-care mandate. We simply fund it and supply that care in a nonsensical, inefficient, exorbitantly expensive way. Let me explain.

While countries such as Great Britain have a government-run, single-payer (or “socialized medicine”) system, others, such as business-friendly Switzerland, have a totally private system.

Switzerland utilizes private health insurance companies and requires all of its residents to purchase health insurance through an individual mandate. It reformed its system several decades ago to a fashion similar to what is included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed by President Obama. According to the World Health Organization, quality of care in Switzerland is high, everyone has access to care, and Switzerland spends only 11 percent of its GDP on health care.

The so-called individual mandate in Mr. Obama’s health-care law is a mechanism used to require all uninsured residents, including the young and the healthy, to buy health insurance. One of the key concepts of insurance is to spread risk among as many people as possible by getting them all into the same “risk pool” – the healthy and the sick, the young and the old, and, more important, those with pre-existing conditions.

Contrary to some of the current political rhetoric, the concept of an individual mandate was proposed by the conservative Heritage Foundation, and even endorsed in earlier times by Republican presidential candidates. If the Supreme Court rules that the individual mandate is unconstitutional, the entire health-care reform program will be in jeopardy, because this idea of spreading risk and its associated costs is the underlying foundation (and intent) of the law.

Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story

  • Weekly review of global news and ideas
  • Balanced, insightful and trustworthy
  • Subscribe in print or digital

Special Offer

 

Doing Good

 

What happens when ordinary people decide to pay it forward? Extraordinary change...

Danny Bent poses at the starting line of the Boston Marathon in Hopkinton, Mass.

After the Boston Marathon bombings, Danny Bent took on a cross-country challenge

The athlete-adventurer co-founded a relay run called One Run for Boston that started in Los Angeles and ended at the marathon finish line to raise funds for victims.

 
 
Become a fan! Follow us! Google+ YouTube See our feeds!