Egypt after Mubarak: History has been made, but what's next?
Hosni Mubarak has stepped down, and Egyptian protesters are jubilant. Weeks of demonstrations were 'defined by a spirit of unity,' as President Obama said in his recent remarks. But as the military takes over and Muslim Brotherhood leaders begin to speak up, many questions remain.
After 18 days of heroic and determined protests, the crisis in Egypt has led to the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, followed by, not surprisingly, unprecedented jubilation in the streets. The BBC’s Lyse Doucet reported from the midst of a euphoric crowd in Tahrir Square: “There are people here who have stood here for 18 days and have literally made history in their own country.”Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Field Marshal Mohammed Hussein Tantawi, the defense minister and commander-in-chief of the armed forces, is the head of the Higher Military Council that has taken control in Egypt – and now de facto head of state. Born in 1935, he was made minister of defense in 1991. He was appointed deputy prime minister on Jan. 29, amid efforts to appease the protesters.
A leading opposition figure, Mohamed ElBaradei, declared: “This is the greatest day of my life.” The Nobel laureate, like everyone celebrating on the streets, said that Egypt had been “liberated after decades of repression.” He said further that he expects a “beautiful” transition of power in his country.
Key questions for transition
There is no denying that history has already been made by the power of the people in Egypt. Many questions, however, remain during this crucial phase of transition. Former Egyptian Army General Samah Seif El Yazal has told the BBC: “There are two directions the Higher Military Council can go. The first is to ask the existing government to run the country for a transitional period of perhaps a year. The other option is for the military to run the country by committee. We are very anxious to hear from them about what they intend to do.”
The two best-organized forces during the current crisis have been the armed forces and the Muslim Brotherhood. The latter, however, has not been able to play a leading role, largely because of the earlier hesitations of its senior leadership. The leaders hesitated at least for two reasons. One is their aversion to and suspicion of the secular forces. The other is their initial pessimistic estimate of the level of anger and energy of the masses, and their staying power.
It is important to understand that this popular revolt is not about Islam – let alone an Islamic jihad. It is clearly about political freedom and basic economic needs.