Could Israeli-Palestinian talks bring peace?
Direct Middle East peace talks got under way today in Washington.
Secretary of State Clinton today formally kicked off a major effort to broker peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Since every US president since Richard Nixon has tried – and failed – to achieve a lasting peace, there's a healthy degree of skepticism, even cynicism about these talks. But as the Monitor's Howard LaFranchi reported this week, conditions may be ripe for progress. A big reason why is that President Obama is committing to this effort early in his term:Skip to next paragraph
Veterans Day: Monitor Facebook fans sound off
Bahrain protests and Obama's 'drop by' diplomacy
Honk if you support Saudi women drivers
How Kevorkian and assisted suicide fit into America's mixed moral landscape
Keeping on with the work of a slain journalist in Pakistan
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Under other presidents, Levy says, a one-year deadline for reaching a settlement could be scoffed at – as when George W. Bush launched the Annapolis process – because it generally came when the president had only a year or so left in office. But Obama’s case is different, coming so early in a first term, he says.
“It’s different when you’re in your last year of an administration,” Levy says. “But if your one-year deadline butts up against the beginning of your reelection campaign, [it] does create a different order of magnitude of self-created political pressure.”
Do you think this round of talks could yield real peace? Share your thoughts below.