Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Editorial Board Blog

Special Envoy Mitchell turns back doubts on Mideast peace talks -- excerpts

At a press conference, the US envoy to the Middle East turned back doubts about the resumption of direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. By harking back to his own experience and by pointing to the big picture, Mitchell brought hope to a process with a history of failure.

By / August 20, 2010

US Mideast Special Envoy George Mitchell briefs the press at the State Department Aug. 20 about a new round of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Israeli and Palestinian leaders would resume direct peace talks in Washington on Sept. 2, with the goal of a settlement in one year.



I was struck by the sense of uplift in the remarks of Special Mideast Envoy George Mitchell at his Aug. 20 press conference. He kept pointing to the larger context as he answered reporters' questions about the planned return to direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, scheduled to resume on Sept. 2 after months on ice.

Skip to next paragraph

Recent posts

Given the history of failure in such talks, many of the questions naturally focused on obstacles. But the former senator determinedly turned back the doubts. He strode the moral high road and kept pointing to the bigger picture as a way around roadblocks to the final destination of two states.

While the devil may be in the details of negotiation, could it be that continual emphasis on the big picture, on the larger stakes, is what will keep negotiators at the table and result in an agreement?

Rather than sum up what he said, here's Mr. Mitchell in his own eloquent words. The following are key excerpts. The questions have been paraphrased:

Q. All parties have been down this road many times before. What engenders hope this time that these talks will have their intended end?

A. I’ll return, if I might, to my experience in Northern Ireland. I chaired three separate sets of discussions in Northern Ireland, spanning a period overall of five years. The main negotiation lasted for 22 months. During that time, the effort was repeatedly branded a failure. I was asked at least dozens, perhaps hundreds, of times when I was leaving because the effort had failed.

And of course, if the objective is to achieve a peace agreement, until you do achieve one, you have failed to do so. In a sense, in Northern Ireland, we had about 700 days of failure and one day of success. And we approach this task with the same determination to succeed notwithstanding the difficulties and notwithstanding the inability to get a final result so far, including past efforts. But past efforts at peace that did not succeed cannot deter us from trying again, because the cause is noble and just and right for all concerned.

Q. It took about nine months to get Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to agree to sit down and talk with each other. What makes you think you can get them to agree to peace in one year?

A. I liken it to the first time I owned a house and had it painted. It took the painters seemingly forever to prime the building and the walls. I kept asking myself, “When are they going to start painting? We’re paying by the hour and we want some progress.” And after this seemingly endless priming, they painted it very quickly.


Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story