Online discussion forums: Should websites make readers use real names?
An interesting piece in the Boston Globe Sunday Magazine examines the cost of allowing anonymous postings on Internet discussion forums. "After years of letting anonymity rule online," the article states, "many media heavyweights, from The Washington Post to The Huffington Post, have begun to modify their policies. The goal is to take the playground back from anonymous bullies and give greater weight to those willing to offer, in addition to strong views, their real names."
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
11.11.11
Veterans Day: Monitor Facebook fans sound off -
06.07.11
Bahrain protests and Obama's 'drop by' diplomacy -
06.06.11
Honk if you support Saudi women drivers -
06.03.11
How Kevorkian and assisted suicide fit into America's mixed moral landscape -
06.01.11
Keeping on with the work of a slain journalist in Pakistan
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
What do you think? Should more websites – from travel review sites to blogs – insist on real names, or is anonymity an important part of the Web's open format that's worth preserving?
Share your comments using the form below.





These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.