- $1 billion Empire State Building IPO: why it won't be like Facebook IPO
- In surprise move, GOP leaders admit defeat in payroll tax battle
- More than 30,000 Germans turn out against anti-piracy treaty ACTA
- Does Obama blueprint reduce budget deficit fast enough? (+video)
- Pentagon budget: Does it pit active-duty forces against retirees? (+video)
- Murdoch media crisis deepens with five new arrests
- How Pinterest combines the best parts of Facebook, Tumblr, and Etsy
- US, China face 'trust deficit' as China's heir apparent visits
San Diego Padres' stadium report: $5 return for every $1 invested. Really?
A new report suggests that the Padres baseball stadium created $5 of value for every $1 in public investment.
The first pitch is thrown at the San Diego Padres' $485 million Petco Park in March 2004 (to start a college game). A new report says the 44,000 seat stadium created $5 of value for every $1 invested publicly, but some question the estimate as being too rosy.
Mike Blake/Reuters/File
Interesting story in the Watchdog column of the San Diego Union Tribune about a consultant, Conventions Sports & Leisure International, that has a “record of sunny forecasts” on stadium impacts. CSL has been quite active in the stadium impact business, it seems.
Skip to next paragraph
(The Sports Economist)
Recent posts
Last week, a CSL report stated that each $1 of public investment in Petco Park (home of the San Diego Padres) was “met by more than $5 in private investment.” Is that cause for celebration? Maybe. The story provides links to the report (so you be the judge) along with other reports issued by CSL. Kudos to Watchdog for posting those, along with the wry comment that CSL “could be warming up to examine a proposed Chargers relocation. If the firm’s previous analyses are any guide, expect promising forecasts for stadium boosters.”
A friend of mine lives in San Diego, loves baseball, and told me about these “5 to 1″ claims several years ago. He believes Petco Park did make a difference to the re-development of San Diego’s Gaslamp District, primarily by providing a physical barrier between the district and the unsightly — by today’s standards — railyards. (See the picture on p. 2 of the CSL report). But he’s a skeptic of the 5-1 claim. The report (p. 69) lists $1.79 billion in increased property value due to the ballpark. Wow, that’s a big number! One interpretation of this figure is that there is a large negative externality associated with the San Diego railyards.
Add/view comments on this post.
------------------------------
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.
Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube