Apple sell-off: Who saw it coming?

Apple's 30 percent sell-off was predicted by technicians who study price, Brown writes. Price action, he adds, flashed a screaming sell signal way before the turn in the Apple's business prospects had become evident.

By , Guest blogger

  • close
    The Apple logo hangs in a glass enclosure above the Fifth Avenue Apple Store in New York. Technicians very neatly timed a sell call on Apple, Brown writes.
    View Caption

Was Apple's fall from grace unforeseeable?

That's become the prevailing wisdom among those covering the aftermath - but I don't think so.

Felix Salmon has a great post where he builds upon the James Stewart piece I linked to over the weekend and offers a good overview of what went wrong when 57 brokerage firm analysts rode the stock right off the cliff.  He gets the story 98% right - except for this very important detail:

Recommended: 20 best iPhone apps for starters

the clear implication here is that the analysts following Apple should have seen the fall coming. But you can’t time an individual stock like that: no one can. Especially when there was nothing — no thing — which caused the stock to fall. Apple stock was going up, and then it was going down.

Begging your pardon, Felix, but it is not true that "no one" could see the 30% sell-off coming.  There is one of group of analysts that very neatly timed a sell call on Apple. The technicians. Almost all of the ones I follow. Because they know very little about Apple the company - they do not spend their days talking to Asian component suppliers or obsessing over how many inches the iPad Mini's screen is.

Instead they study price. And price action, unlike company fundamentals, flashed a screaming sell signal way before the turn in the company's business prospects had become evident. 

This is not to say that technical analysis is superior to fundamental analysis. It is to say, however, that the study of price - which is only the supply/ demand dynamics of a particular asset and nothing more esoteric or magical than that - has it's uses. Particularly at major turning points.

The study of price, in this case, would have shown you a parabolic share price with deteriorating relative strength and slowing momentum.

My technician friends rarely seek credit for their good calls. They take what they do seriously and their blogging is meant to help them discover what they actually think and to generate real-time feedback that may be constructive as they improve their craft.

To the extent that I possibly can, I mean to give some of  them credit where it's been earned.  Here are two prominent examples:

JC Parets at All Star Charts on September 10th: Is Apple About to Crash?

Peter Brandt at Factor Advisors on October 9th:  The Apple is Falling from the Tree

Sell-side analysts who study a company and not a stock will continue to deliver to half the story. I recommend getting the whole thing when possible.

Source:

Why Apple should ignore its shareholders (Reuters)

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here.To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on www.thereformedbroker.com.

Share this story:
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...