EU snags the Nobel Peace Prize. Now what?
There are good years and there are bad years for the Nobel Peace Prize, Brown writes. What will the prize mean for the future of the European Union?
Joshua has been managing money for high net worth clients, charitable foundations, corporations and retirement plans for more than a decade.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
It was also pointed that out that, ironically, the selection committee is out of Norway, a nation that would fit perfectly into the EU - except that it had chosen not to join. A wise choice, especially considering both the absolute and relative strength of the Norwegian economy (lots of oil, it's like a snowy Saudi Arabia, also they made a conscious decision to use the oil wealth for the good of their entire society, not just for whichever Viking stumbled upon it first in the North Sea).
Anyway, my other thought was that there are good years and stupid years for the Nobel Peace Prize, I'm not sure which this will turn out to be. Remember that Yasser Arafat once won, shortly before becoming the father of modern day terrorism. Also, one-termer Jimmy Carter for some unenduring reason no one can remember. They also gave Henry Kissinger the award for signing the Vietnam Accords, in the meantime he had been secretly bombing Laos.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here.To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on www.thereformedbroker.com.