Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

The Circle Bastiat

Empty seats at the Olympics: Bad price control to blame?

British Olympic organizers restricted ticket prices and rewarded  bulk corporate purchases (but not use).  They shouldn't be surprised to see so many empty seats.

By Christopher Westley, Guest blogger / July 31, 2012

Britain fans sit in the stands as rain falls before the team eventing jumping equestrian final at the 2012 Summer Olympics at Greenwich Park in London on Tuesday, July 31, 2012. Organizers are facing a rash of empty seats at even high-profile Olympic events like gymnastics.

Andrew Milligan/AP

Enlarge

The British Olympic organizers restricted ticket purchases, rewarded corporate purchases but not corporate use, imposed price controls on tickets available to the public and state violence against the resulting scalpers (touts) — and are distraught and surprised over the empty seats that characterize so many of the Olympic events so far.  To reduce the embarrassment and sense of scandal, organizers have carted in British troops–dressed in their camo!–to fill seats at gymnastics events, while other easily manipulated, low-time-cost groups on the government’s payroll are also being bussed in to other sparsely-attended venues.

Skip to next paragraph

This is the institutional blog of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and many of its affiliated writers and scholars commenting on economic affairs of the day.

Recent posts

Meanwhile, many thousands willing to pay market prices to attend Olympic events are told to bugger off.

The Olympics are essentially mercantile events in which planning takes place outside of market forces so as to achieve outcomes preferred not by consumers but by states.  (Peter Hitchens argues here that this trend started with the 1936 Olympics in Berlin when Hitler and Goebbels transformed them into “grandiose and torch-lit” spectacles.)  Regardless, the events in London are demonstrating once again what an LSE economist in the 1930s said about economics–that its “curious task” was “to demonstrate to men how little they know about what they imagine they can design.”  Why did Sebastian Coe and his team think they could effect a better outcome than what would result from the price system?  These are practical men, but even Keynes might admit that they are probably slaves of some defunct and incorrect economist.

RELATED: 2012 London Olympics quiz: Are you ready for a gold medal?

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on blog.mises.org.

  • Weekly review of global news and ideas
  • Balanced, insightful and trustworthy
  • Subscribe in print or digital

Special Offer

 

Doing Good

 

What happens when ordinary people decide to pay it forward? Extraordinary change...

Paul Giniès is the general manager of the International Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering (2iE) in Burkina Faso, which trains more than 2,000 engineers from more than 30 countries each year.

Paul Giniès turned a failing African university into a world-class problem-solver

Today 2iE is recognized as a 'center of excellence' producing top-notch home-grown African engineers ready to address the continent's problems.

 
 
Become a fan! Follow us! Google+ YouTube See our feeds!