The 'Occupy' movement will hurt free enterprise
This whole thing represents blowback against all the varieties of “macroeconomic management” – and that includes “stimulus,” “stabilization,” bailouts and everything else.
Reading through the CBS news story on the globalization of the Occupy movement, complete with wicked violence and attendant hysteria, it seems rather obvious that this whole thing represents blowback against all the varieties of “macroeconomic management” – and that includes “stimulus,” “stabilization,” QE1, QE2, bailouts and everything else.Skip to next paragraph
This is the institutional blog of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and many of its affiliated writers and scholars commenting on economic affairs of the day.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Who benefited most of these policies? Clearly not the masses and not the middle class and not the poor. It was the financial elites who benefited. The policies didn’t work and yet the elites got the money anyway, and hence the protests and mania, all of which are being used as a bludgeon not against the macroeconomic stabilizers in government and central banks but against capitalistic enterprise.
There is a rough analogy here to how U.S. foreign policy intervention inspires acts of vengeance against innocents – a reaction that the CIA called blowback. So too these Occupy protests might be seen as a reaction to economic interventionism. And no doubt that free enterprise – the real innocent bystander in this entire ghastly episode – is going to be hurt.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on blog.mises.org.