Car uninsured? In Britain, it could get crushed.

British government can crush cars that are uninsured. Does that make sense?

By , Guest blogger

  • close
    Traffic moves on the M25 London Orbital motorway near junction 22 in Herfordshire, England, in this 2005 file photo. The British government already can crush cars if they're driven by uninsured motors. Now, government wants to crush them even if they're not driven.
    View Caption

Back in 2005, the UK's Labour administration announced that it would be seizing and crushing the cars of people who drove without being insured. This week, ministers in the new Coalition government are to go further even than this, saying that anyone who merely keeps an uninsured vehicle faces having it seized and crushed.

 

Such proposals show how tentative a grip our politicians have on commonsense, and on justice. Commonsense first: where do I start? Well, (1) problem of uninsured vehicles is the problem of people driving them and being involved in accidents, and then having no insurance with which to compensate any victims. Collectors and other people may well own cars which they have no intention of ever taking on the road, and so do not bother to insure. It is simply absurd that they should face the cost of insuring a vehicle that never moves out of the garage. (2) When people or property are injured in an accident caused by an uninsured driver, seizing and crushing the driver's car does nothing to help. Sure, the threat of it might dissuade people from driving without insurance, but other, more traditional penalties might be equally effective on that front. In any case, (3) selling the car in order to compensate the driver's accident victims might do more for them. (4) Even on the simple grounds of economy, is it not better to preserve a perfectly good car than send it to the crusher, just so lawmakers can show how 'tough' they are?

Recommended: Business

 

But there is a justice question too. The present and proposed law have no regard to the value of the car. The loss to the uninsured driver could vary considerably depending on whether it was a Fiat or a Mercedes. And the point about justice is that the penalty should be the same for everyone. It's time our politicians stepped outside their dreamworld and got a bit of common sense. And it's time that they stopped trying to think up a headline-grabbing arbitrary 'solution' to every problem and learnt something about the principles of justice.

 

Edit: In the comments, HJ777 makes a point about SORNs (Statutory Off-Road Notifications) which are designed to avoid the situation outlined above. I'd overlooked this, but the point remains because many people will lack the time and knowledge to get out one until it's too late. Thanks to HJ777 for the pointer.

 

 

Add/view comments on this post.

 

--------------------------

 

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...