Sherwood Forest up for sale: What would Robin Hood say?

Many of Britain's forests belong to the crown, much as American national parks belong to the people. As part of Britain's new austerity, they propose selling them.

|
Alan Klehr / DanitaDelimont.com / Newscom / File
England's Sherwood Forest, legendary home of Robin Hood, as seen on May 16. Many of Britain's national forests will be privatized under the proposed austerity measures announced Oct. 20. Is this a prudent investment for Britain's future, or a good idea taken too far?

The Sunday Telegraph yesterday reported that ministers intend to privatise – or transfer to community groups and mutuals – about a third of Britain's forests. The country's government, struggling to contain huge budget deficits, needs the money of course. Even so, it is very much the right thing to do.

You could guess as much from the fact that the trade unions instantly denounced the plan. They say that private ownership would mean less public access to forest land. They could not be more wrong. For decades, Britain's state-backed Forestry Commission has smothered the hillside of Scotland and Wales in particular with blankets of unattractive, dark, and completely inaccessible conifer forest. Private owners, on the other hand, have a financial incentives not only to manage the forest stock better, but also to open up forest land to paying tourists, and to develop forest resorts for tourists and hikers. And rights of public access can be guaranteed, even extended, as part of the sale process.

New Zealand, for example, developed a leasing system to combine the benefits of private-sector management with the guarantee of public access and amenity. Forests are an important environmental resource in New Zealand, where natural and commercial forests cover around a third of the land area. In the 1980s, the then Labour government wisely separated its state management authority from the actual ownership of the forests, and identified those forests which should be reserved and managed principally for amenity rather than commercial use. The changes led to immediate beneficial returns, reversing the need for state subsidies, and in fact encouraging a sharp rise in new plantings and timber production.

For more on New Zealand, see our ideas piece Out of the Woods. See also Douglas Mason's ASI report Wood for the Trees and Miles Saltiel's Forests for the People.

Add/view comments on this post.

------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Sherwood Forest up for sale: What would Robin Hood say?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Adam-Smith-Institute-Blog/2010/1027/Sherwood-Forest-up-for-sale-What-would-Robin-Hood-say
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe