Harry Potter and the Social Security stone

Researchers claim to have found a way to extend lifespans by 12 percent. What does this mean for America's Social Security and Britain's social pensions?

By , Guest blogger

  • close
    Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) and Seamus (Devon Murray) stare at Seamus's exploding wand in this film still from 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone' (publicized abroad as 'Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.' If life spans continue to lengthen, with or without the discovery of a 'philosopher's stone' to make humans immortal, what will it mean for Social Security and social pensions?
    View Caption

Researchers at the University of Milan have discovered an "elixir of life", made up of amino acids and antioxidants that can boost the age of mice by 12%. The research team believes this "philosopher's stone" could be used by humans. In a number of years we could expect to see something similar appear on the market: not only does it boost lifespan, but it increases stamina and muscle co-ordination, so we may see many sprightly pensioners in coming years.

This may help reduce government spending on social care, particularly for the elderly, which was expected to double by 2035, but with life expectancy already on the rise and fast outstripping birth rates, such a move could force governments to raise the state pension ages much sooner than expected.

The original 1908 old age pension was to paid at 70, at a time when life expectancy was around 50. Nowadays, life expectancy at birth is just under 80, and the state pension age will be 65 for both men and women by 2020. The new 'triple lock' on pensions means that they are unlikely to become less generous, so a further, faster increase in the pension age will be necessary. This age crunch was already inevitable - there will be a point at which supporting pensioners will be a huge burden on a much smaller number of younger, working taxpayers.

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

The Chancellor George Osborne has already hinted at plans to raise the age to 68 by 2046, but if we are to see a jump in life expectancy to something approaching 90 thanks to this "elixir", then a faster increase is inevitable. The unpleasant alternative would be to wait until it is too late, when the young people of today and of the future will have to shoulder our burgeoning state pensions, and then risk the uproar of those having to endure a sharp increase in the state pension age or a cut in its generosity. Much like dealing with the deficit, pension reform needs to be done as soon as possible so that a larger crisis can be averted.

Add/view comments on this post.

------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...