Britain's Liberal-Democrat party and Labour party compromise on capital gains

Britain's two main parties have compromised on capital gains tax, but the agreement is attracting criticism.

  • close
    Street signs are seen near the Houses of Parliament in London. Britain's two leading parties came to a compromise on capital gains tax.
    Toby Melville/Reuters
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

The Liberal-Democrat manifesto proposed raising Capital Gains Tax from its 18 percent to parity with income tax, whose current top rate is 50 percent, thanks to Labour's punitive increase. Unfortunately this proposal features in the agreement between the coalition partners. Not surprisingly it is attracting much criticism, since it is, at best, economically illiterate.

It would wreak immense damage on the UK economy. A top rate of 50 percent would be about the highest in the world, and would cause a massive exodus of capital, as people moved to holding assets elsewhere. One of the Treasury's main concerns is the 'leakage' made possible by a wide difference in rates, with some people trying to switch their rewards to capital gains in order to pay lower taxes.

It is doubtful that many people have this option, but the obvious compromise is to adopt the US solution, which distinguishes between short-term speculation and long-term asset appreciation. In the US, gains made within a year are taxed in the same way as income. A preferential rate applies to assets held for more than a year. This was zero for those in the bottom two tax brackets, and 15 percent for most people above that level (though increases are on the way next year).

In the UK we could tax gains made within a year at normal income tax rates, and keep the 18 percent rate for longer term gains. Lord Forsyth's tax commission advocated a tapering down of capital gains taxes, and now a group of MPs which includes John Redwood has suggested a taper which would tax gains within a year at income tax rates, two year gains at 30%, three year gains at 20% and four year gains at 10%, with five and above year gains exempt altogether.

This is clearly the way to meet Treasury concerns without punishing savers and attacking capital investments. The question now is whether the government will listen to the concerns that have been raised, and alter their plans accordingly.

Add/view comments on this post.

------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK