Future of the British Financial Services Authority
Outgoing FSA head Hector Sants is expected to seek tighter regulation of British banks. Too much regulation, however, could create real problems.
Hector Sants, head of the Financial Services Authority, was our guest at a Power Lunch in Westminster on Monday. I can't relay the discussion to you because it was off the record (and I love to think that a stray word about such an encounter might send the markets spinning up or down, but in reality I know it won't).Skip to next paragraph
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Mr. Sants is on the way out already, but if George Osborne has his way, many of his colleagues will be following, apart from the few who will be bussed to Threadneedle Street to help the Bank of England take back the role of regulating the banks. In the Osborne plan, the FSA will become simply a consumer financial protection agency, rather than the financial-markets regulator.
I'm not sure about this move, and neither are the banks. Sure, banking regulation must be returned to the Bank of England. The Bank at least knows something about the state of the markets – it can see who is coming in to borrow money, for example – while the mega-quango in Docklands that Gordon Brown created, obsessed with its checklists, plainly never had a clue that the banks were about to run out of money and precipitate a global financial crisis.
But a financial consumer protection agency, particularly one rising out of the FSA's ashes, could create real problems too. Freed at last of any responsibility for keeping the banks financially sound, all its time, energy, staff and considerable dollops of taxpayer cash would be focused on trying to get a 'better deal' for bank customers. Regardless of whether its proposals destroyed the incentives on customers to be careful about their borrowing, or of banks to provide sound lending. It would just become a sugar-daddy, enjoying favourable press for proposals like maximum (and probably equal) interest rates on credit cards, for example, regardless of whether this meant responsible borrowers subsidising irresponsible ones, or whether it made the entire credit card business unecoomic for the providers.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.