- In surprise move, GOP leaders admit defeat in payroll tax battle
- More than 30,000 Germans turn out against anti-piracy treaty ACTA
- Does Obama blueprint reduce budget deficit fast enough? (+video)
- Pentagon budget: Does it pit active-duty forces against retirees? (+video)
- Deadlock on Syria: Likely crimes against humanity, but no plan of action
Can Brazil's protectionism get US to practice free trade?
Despite a favorable WTO ruling, Brazil can't get US to change cotton subsidies. So Brazil threatens protectionism to get free trade.
The sun sets on a cotton field south of Lubbock, Texas, in this 2007 file photo. The WTO has ruled that US cotton subsidies violate free trade rules, but the US is standing pat. So Brazil is threatening protectionism to force the US to practice free trade.
LM Otero/AP/File
Following a WTO ruling in their favour, Brazil proposed tariffs on US goods if American cotton subsidies weren’t repealed. With the proposal provoking little response, Brazil has recently threatened to disregard American intellectual property rights on top of the tariffs. This would include pharmaceutical drugs, movies, food, and much else. American lawmakers aren’t budging on the cotton subsidies.
Skip to next paragraph
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog.
Recent posts
So the die is cast and a serious trade war looms. I can’t get upset at Brazil for this. The country is trying to trade freely; it has filed suits against America through the WTO and the provisional tariffs do not extend to other countries. Indeed, the very fact that the Brazilian government is able to propose tariffs without implementing them shows both admirable restraint and a degree of autonomy that American leadership seems to lack. Entrenched agricultural interests in the US have the votes to block any legislation repealing the abusive subsidies, and even without their influence, there are always plenty of legislators eager to appropriate money from whomever they can.
Brazil has taken the unusual step of threatening intellectual property rights because they want these sanctions to have real bite. Mere tariffs will hurt Brazilian consumers as much as American exporters, and thus this kind of retaliatory action is self-defeating. However, with the suspension of American intellectual property rights, Brazilian consumers will be gaining something beneficial (albeit at the expense of overseas intellectual property markets). It is a gift of generic medications, of counterfeit DVDs, and of imitated clothing. American copyright holders should be worried, and they should put their energies toward lobbying for the end of American cotton subsidies – and other agricultural subsidies while they’re at it.
The Brazilian government is making these threats on behalf of the private sector. It is trying to tear down, rather than erect, trade barriers. This dispute is a tale of legitimate Brazilian business interests standing up to DC beltway graft.
Add/view comments on this post.
------------------------------
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above
Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube