Costs of London Olympics ballooning. Can Paris play host? Athens?
Even if the London Olympics stuck to its original book cost, the net benefits would be negative.
We've been told endlessly that the London Olympics is going to make us all such a wonderful profit! You know, never mind the expense, just feel the width of all that infrastructure. Poeple will be so impressed with London that they'll all come as tourists for years to come! Slightly missing the point that anyone who has the money to travel has almost certainly heard of London already.Skip to next paragraph
The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
To assuage our doubts over all of this we've been offered a number of papers from the various organisers and boosters stating that all will indeed be well. However, here's a paper looking at the costs, in an impartial manner, of the current Vancouver Games. Agreed, it's a student paper but at least it's not being paid for by people looking for a particular answer.
And the answer that's found is that, even if the Games stuck to their orignal book costs (an assumption in our own case which has been blown through by a factor of four already and we've still two years to go) then the net benefits of the Games would be negative. There's a very clever little observation in there as to why this might be so as well:
“Economic theory casts doubt on a substantial windfall for the host city from the Olympic Games. Cities competing with one another for the Games would theoretically bid until their expected return reached zero.”
Quite: in order to get the games you've got to bid more than everyone else. More in terms of the new stadia you will build, more you'll spend on making it the bestest outdoor jamboree for track suited drug addicts ever. And it takes place in an auction atmosphere, which leads to the winner's curse, the bidding is done by politicians which is never a good sign and the bidding is done with other peoples' money which is a violation of Uncle Milt's the four ways to spend money.
Then we go off and hire a bunch of superannuated politicians (look, Seb Coe was a great runner and is a nice man but losing your seat as an MP in Falmouth does not make you a great construction manager) and we're surprised when the Olympics bankrupt most of the places that hold them?
I'd just like to repeat the point that it's really not too late to give Paris a phone call and ask if they're still interested. Indeed, I think we might find that Athens has everything necessary and it's certainly true that they could use the influx of what cash there is right now. They've already built all the stadia anyway....
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the view expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.