Being IRS commissioner shouldn't be mission impossible

The 2016 Republican Party platform demands that Congress impeach and convict Internal Revenue Service Commissioner John Koskinen. Impeaching the commissioner may be good political theater, but it's bad for the country.

|
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
The IRS.

The 2016 Republican Party platform demands that Congress impeach and convict Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen. His “high crimes and misdemeanors” primarily consist of annoying congressional leaders and heading an agency charged with interpreting and enforcing the incoherent tax laws that Congress has inflicted on the American public—the definition of a thankless job. Impeaching the commissioner may be good political theater, but it's bad for the country.

Over the years, the IRS has been led by a long list of admirable public servants of both parties. One, Mort Caplin, just celebrated his 100th birthday. Mort, a war hero decorated for valor at Normandy, probably saw serving as JFK’s Commissioner as a comparatively safe job.

Current Commissioner John Koskinen is only dodging metaphorical bullets, but the hail of fire is unrelenting. 

Koskinen, who is 77, has had a remarkable career. Following many years in public service, he spent two decades reviving failing companies for an investment banking firm. He tried to retire but instead returned to public service—helping the government navigate the Y2K transition without a hitch. After trying to retire again, President Obama asked Koskinen to manage one more turn-around—this time to improve operations at the long-troubled IRS. His highest profile task: to undo the damage from the agency’s targeting for heightened scrutiny tea party and other conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status.

I imagine that the White House job offer sounded something like this: “John, I want you to walk away from your cushy retirement to take over an agency in crisis. Your compensation will be a paycheck you don't need and an unending series of attacks from congressional demagogues and partisan media. And, by the way, don’t look for us to publicly defend you because no politician will stand up for the IRS.”

Cue the music from Mission Impossible, but Mr. Koskinen was a great choice to rescue the reviled but essential agency. And he truly has an exceptional sense of public service.

He probably didn't anticipate that his hard work would result in some House leaders and the official GOP platform calling for his impeachment. The charges: some emails lost by IRS staff and making a House committee wait a few weeks before responding to a subpoena. The same Treasury inspector general who flagged the targeting of conservative groups called Koskinen “exceptionally cooperative.” (AEI’s Norm Ornstein published an excellent dissection  of what he calls the House “show trial” in The Atlantic.)

To their credit, Ways & Means Committee Chair Kevin Brady (R-TX) and Senate Finance Committee Chair Orrin Hatch (R-UT) have declined to join the mob.

Koskinen, who is tough as nails, will be okay, but the damage to our fiscal system could be longer lasting.  If the goal is to improve the IRS—as it should be—the agency needs more people like Koskinen, Caplin, and the admirable souls who served between them (many of whom have rallied to Koskinen’s defense). Public servants willing to take on the enormous challenges facing the IRS shouldn't have to face a hail of metaphorical bullets for trying to do their job.

This story originally appeared on TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Being IRS commissioner shouldn't be mission impossible
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Tax-VOX/2016/0802/Being-IRS-commissioner-shouldn-t-be-mission-impossible
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe